College of American Pathologists (CAP)/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) proficiency testing for urinary glycosaminoglycan analysis: A summary of performance

Kristina Cusmano-Ozog , Dietrich Matern , Thomas Long , Nicola Longo , Sarah Young
{"title":"College of American Pathologists (CAP)/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) proficiency testing for urinary glycosaminoglycan analysis: A summary of performance","authors":"Kristina Cusmano-Ozog ,&nbsp;Dietrich Matern ,&nbsp;Thomas Long ,&nbsp;Nicola Longo ,&nbsp;Sarah Young","doi":"10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) accumulate in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS), multiple sulfatase deficiency, and mucolipidoses; measurement of total GAGs and the specific excretion pattern by fractionation can aid in their diagnosis. Since 1993, the College of American Pathologists with the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics has offered proficiency testing (PT) for urine GAG analysis accessible to laboratories worldwide.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from PT surveys administered from 2016 to 2022 were assessed for trends in participation and methodological platforms used, as well as analytical performance and diagnostic accuracy by method and disease.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The number of participating laboratories declined from 43 in 2016 to 28 in 2022. Fourteen urine samples with clinical vignettes were distributed; the median of correct diagnoses reported was 91.5% (range: 74%-100%). The best performing methodologies for total GAG analysis and fractionation were dimethylmethylene blue-dye-binding spectrophotometric assay and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, respectively. MPS IV samples posed the greatest diagnostic challenge, whereas the overall false-positive rate was low.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Based on the data reviewed, best patient care for those at risk of an MPS is achieved by a combination of total GAG analysis and GAG fractionation. Development of liquid-chromatography-tandem-mass-spectrometry-based methods for quantitative, differentiated GAG analysis or disease-specific GAG-derived nonreducing end oligosaccharide fragments in combination with multiplexed lysosomal enzyme assays will likely improve diagnostic accuracy. The decline of laboratories participating in PT is concerning because MPS are increasingly included in newborn screening programs and urinary GAGs can be used to monitor the effectiveness of new therapies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100576,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine Open","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 101912"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949774424010586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) accumulate in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS), multiple sulfatase deficiency, and mucolipidoses; measurement of total GAGs and the specific excretion pattern by fractionation can aid in their diagnosis. Since 1993, the College of American Pathologists with the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics has offered proficiency testing (PT) for urine GAG analysis accessible to laboratories worldwide.

Methods

Data from PT surveys administered from 2016 to 2022 were assessed for trends in participation and methodological platforms used, as well as analytical performance and diagnostic accuracy by method and disease.

Results

The number of participating laboratories declined from 43 in 2016 to 28 in 2022. Fourteen urine samples with clinical vignettes were distributed; the median of correct diagnoses reported was 91.5% (range: 74%-100%). The best performing methodologies for total GAG analysis and fractionation were dimethylmethylene blue-dye-binding spectrophotometric assay and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, respectively. MPS IV samples posed the greatest diagnostic challenge, whereas the overall false-positive rate was low.

Conclusion

Based on the data reviewed, best patient care for those at risk of an MPS is achieved by a combination of total GAG analysis and GAG fractionation. Development of liquid-chromatography-tandem-mass-spectrometry-based methods for quantitative, differentiated GAG analysis or disease-specific GAG-derived nonreducing end oligosaccharide fragments in combination with multiplexed lysosomal enzyme assays will likely improve diagnostic accuracy. The decline of laboratories participating in PT is concerning because MPS are increasingly included in newborn screening programs and urinary GAGs can be used to monitor the effectiveness of new therapies.
美国病理学家学院(CAP)/美国医学遗传学和基因组学学院(ACMG)尿糖胺聚糖分析能力测试:性能总结
目的糖胺聚糖(GAGs)在粘多糖病(MPS)、多重磺化酶缺乏症和粘脂病患者体内蓄积;通过分馏法测定总gag和特定排泄模式有助于诊断。自1993年以来,美国病理学家学院与美国医学遗传学和基因组学学院已经为世界各地的实验室提供尿GAG分析的能力测试(PT)。方法评估2016年至2022年PT调查数据的参与趋势和使用的方法平台,以及方法和疾病的分析性能和诊断准确性。结果参与实验室数量由2016年的43家减少到2022年的28家。分发14份尿样并附有临床提示;报告的正确诊断中位数为91.5%(范围:74%-100%)。总GAG分析和分馏的最佳方法分别是二甲基亚甲基蓝染料结合分光光度法和液相色谱-串联质谱法。MPS IV样本是最大的诊断挑战,而总体假阳性率很低。结论根据所回顾的数据,对MPS风险患者的最佳护理是通过总GAG分析和GAG分离相结合来实现的。基于液相色谱串联质谱的定量、差异化GAG分析或疾病特异性GAG衍生的非还原端寡糖片段与多重溶酶体酶测定相结合的方法的发展可能会提高诊断的准确性。参与PT的实验室数量的减少令人担忧,因为MPS越来越多地被纳入新生儿筛查项目,尿液gag可用于监测新疗法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信