Evaluation of accessibility disparities in urban areas during disruptive events based on transit real data

IF 12.5 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Alessandro Nalin , Nir Fulman , Emily Charlotte Wilke , Christina Ludwig , Alexander Zipf , Claudio Lantieri , Valeria Vignali , Andrea Simone
{"title":"Evaluation of accessibility disparities in urban areas during disruptive events based on transit real data","authors":"Alessandro Nalin ,&nbsp;Nir Fulman ,&nbsp;Emily Charlotte Wilke ,&nbsp;Christina Ludwig ,&nbsp;Alexander Zipf ,&nbsp;Claudio Lantieri ,&nbsp;Valeria Vignali ,&nbsp;Andrea Simone","doi":"10.1016/j.commtr.2024.100160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The main motivation of this paper is to emphasize the necessity of assessing the actual performance of public transportation (PT), rather than relying on schedules, when assessing accessibility and equity in the provision of PT services. Real conditions are reflected in datasets such as the outcomes of Automatic Vehicle Monitoring (AVM) systems, whereas schedules are usually provided as General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS). In light of the dissimilar characteristics of central and peripheral neighborhoods, it is crucial to consider the operational conditions that users encounter, particularly in the context of unexpected disruptions that alter regular service. By examining a real-world case study in Bologna, Italy, the research combines well-known measures and innovative methods and demonstrates notable variation in accessibility and equity in the provision of PT services when comparing results based on real-time data with those based on schedules. This work contributes to a more nuanced understanding of urban accessibility and highlights the need for public stakeholders and transport authorities to incorporate actual service conditions into their evaluations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100292,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Transportation Research","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100160"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Transportation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277242472400043X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main motivation of this paper is to emphasize the necessity of assessing the actual performance of public transportation (PT), rather than relying on schedules, when assessing accessibility and equity in the provision of PT services. Real conditions are reflected in datasets such as the outcomes of Automatic Vehicle Monitoring (AVM) systems, whereas schedules are usually provided as General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS). In light of the dissimilar characteristics of central and peripheral neighborhoods, it is crucial to consider the operational conditions that users encounter, particularly in the context of unexpected disruptions that alter regular service. By examining a real-world case study in Bologna, Italy, the research combines well-known measures and innovative methods and demonstrates notable variation in accessibility and equity in the provision of PT services when comparing results based on real-time data with those based on schedules. This work contributes to a more nuanced understanding of urban accessibility and highlights the need for public stakeholders and transport authorities to incorporate actual service conditions into their evaluations.
基于交通实际数据的破坏性事件中城市地区可达性差异评价
本文的主要动机是强调在评估公共交通服务提供的可达性和公平性时,评估公共交通(PT)实际性能的必要性,而不是依赖于时间表。实际情况反映在数据集中,如自动车辆监控(AVM)系统的结果,而时间表通常作为通用运输馈送规范(GTFS)提供。鉴于中心和外围社区的不同特征,考虑用户遇到的操作条件至关重要,特别是在改变常规服务的意外中断的情况下。通过对意大利博洛尼亚的现实案例研究,该研究结合了众所周知的措施和创新方法,并在将基于实时数据的结果与基于时间表的结果进行比较时,证明了PT服务提供的可及性和公平性方面的显着差异。这项工作有助于更细致地了解城市可达性,并强调了公共利益相关者和交通管理部门将实际服务条件纳入其评估的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信