Between binary- and mono-ontologies: The rewilding practice of Shenzhen Overseas Chinese Town Wetland Park

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Zijing Shen , Junxi Qian , Hong Zhu , Shuang Tian
{"title":"Between binary- and mono-ontologies: The rewilding practice of Shenzhen Overseas Chinese Town Wetland Park","authors":"Zijing Shen ,&nbsp;Junxi Qian ,&nbsp;Hong Zhu ,&nbsp;Shuang Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article engages with the scholarships on rewilding, the Anthropocene, and urban nature to advance a case study of urban rewilding in Shenzhen Overseas Chinese Town Wetland Park (OCT Park), the only wetland park located in a megacity centre in China. We argue that the two philosophical underpinnings of rewilding, i.e., the ideal of a pristine baseline and human non-intervention, must be rethought in urban contexts. For one thing, Anthropocenic critiques of the Edenic imagination and the socio-nature dichotomy urge us to envision human-nature interactions as co-constituted and open-ended. For another, urban nature scattered and embedded in complex socio-natural negotiations provides different conditions for rewilding from remote natural reserves. To address these enquiries, we highlight three scenarios in OCT Park: (1) restoration and protection of the wetland; (2) establishment of Nature School and nature education; and (3) disciplining of tourists and the open-ended surprises. This paper reveals OCT Park’s future-focused approach to ecological restoration, its open attitude toward human participation, and the outcomes of human-nature interaction, which collectively constitute a potentially worthwhile model for rewilding practices in urban settings. In doing so, this article adds new knowledge to the rewilding framework by drawing the ontological positions advocated by the Anthropocene literature and an emphasis on urban contexts. Specifically, the paper reveals that human-nature relationships in urban rewilding practices manifest as dynamic negotiations, oscillating between the binary-ontology, which divides humans and non-humans into separate realms, and mono-ontology, which, in contrast, emphasises blurred boundaries and ontological positions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 104201"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525000016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article engages with the scholarships on rewilding, the Anthropocene, and urban nature to advance a case study of urban rewilding in Shenzhen Overseas Chinese Town Wetland Park (OCT Park), the only wetland park located in a megacity centre in China. We argue that the two philosophical underpinnings of rewilding, i.e., the ideal of a pristine baseline and human non-intervention, must be rethought in urban contexts. For one thing, Anthropocenic critiques of the Edenic imagination and the socio-nature dichotomy urge us to envision human-nature interactions as co-constituted and open-ended. For another, urban nature scattered and embedded in complex socio-natural negotiations provides different conditions for rewilding from remote natural reserves. To address these enquiries, we highlight three scenarios in OCT Park: (1) restoration and protection of the wetland; (2) establishment of Nature School and nature education; and (3) disciplining of tourists and the open-ended surprises. This paper reveals OCT Park’s future-focused approach to ecological restoration, its open attitude toward human participation, and the outcomes of human-nature interaction, which collectively constitute a potentially worthwhile model for rewilding practices in urban settings. In doing so, this article adds new knowledge to the rewilding framework by drawing the ontological positions advocated by the Anthropocene literature and an emphasis on urban contexts. Specifically, the paper reveals that human-nature relationships in urban rewilding practices manifest as dynamic negotiations, oscillating between the binary-ontology, which divides humans and non-humans into separate realms, and mono-ontology, which, in contrast, emphasises blurred boundaries and ontological positions.
二元本体与单一本体之间:深圳华侨城湿地公园的野化实践
本文以深圳华侨城湿地公园(华侨城湿地公园)为研究对象,结合“野生化、人类世和城市自然”的研究成果,对深圳华侨城湿地公园的城市野生化进行了研究。深圳华侨城湿地公园是中国唯一一个位于特大城市中心的湿地公园。我们认为,在城市环境中,必须重新思考野生化的两个哲学基础,即原始基线和人类不干预的理想。一方面,人类世对伊甸园想象和社会-自然二分法的批评促使我们把人与自然的互动想象成共同构成和开放式的。另一方面,城市自然的分散和嵌入在复杂的社会自然谈判中,为从偏远的自然保护区恢复野生化提供了不同的条件。为了解决这些问题,我们重点介绍了华侨城公园的三个方案:(1)恢复和保护湿地;(2)建立自然学校,开展自然教育;(3)对游客的约束和开放式的惊喜。本文揭示了华侨城公园以未来为中心的生态恢复方法,对人类参与的开放态度,以及人与自然互动的结果,这些共同构成了一个潜在的有价值的模式,用于城市环境中的野生化实践。在此过程中,本文通过绘制人类世文献所倡导的本体论立场并强调城市背景,为野化框架增加了新的知识。具体而言,本文揭示了城市野化实践中的人与自然关系表现为动态谈判,在二元本体(将人类和非人类划分为不同的领域)和一元本体(相反,强调模糊的边界和本体论立场)之间摇摆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信