Research on smart city construction in the context of public culture

Yuhang Zhang , Jiaji Gao
{"title":"Research on smart city construction in the context of public culture","authors":"Yuhang Zhang ,&nbsp;Jiaji Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.teler.2025.100187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper aims to explore smart city construction in the context of public culture in order to understand the new opportunities and challenges of urban development in the context of the digital era. The emergence of digital media such as interactive technology and virtual reality has changed the service mode of traditional public culture, providing more diversified channels for the public to express their opinions and participate in urban and social governance. However, the social value of humanistic factors such as public culture has been seriously neglected in the construction of smart cities, and there is an urgent need for its value-orientation to put the overly technology-focused enterprise-led smart city construction back on the right path. This paper discusses the development status of smart cities, the advantages and shortcomings of smart cities, and the importance of public culture. In this paper, we analyse the current development status, diverse characteristics, advantages and shortcomings of Chinese smart cities in the context of four cities, namely Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and Hangzhou, and point out the lack of public culture construction in Chinese smart cities. Further, the research delineates five key values of public culture in smart city development and constructs a comprehensive evaluation framework comprising 31 indicators across six dimensions: supply, participation, innovation, fairness, suitability, and richness. Based on this framework, six recommendations are proposed for the development of public cultural initiatives in smart cities to enhance their positive impact on urban development, and to provide a new perspective for promoting the construction of a better and more warm-hearted smart city.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101213,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics Reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772503025000027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to explore smart city construction in the context of public culture in order to understand the new opportunities and challenges of urban development in the context of the digital era. The emergence of digital media such as interactive technology and virtual reality has changed the service mode of traditional public culture, providing more diversified channels for the public to express their opinions and participate in urban and social governance. However, the social value of humanistic factors such as public culture has been seriously neglected in the construction of smart cities, and there is an urgent need for its value-orientation to put the overly technology-focused enterprise-led smart city construction back on the right path. This paper discusses the development status of smart cities, the advantages and shortcomings of smart cities, and the importance of public culture. In this paper, we analyse the current development status, diverse characteristics, advantages and shortcomings of Chinese smart cities in the context of four cities, namely Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and Hangzhou, and point out the lack of public culture construction in Chinese smart cities. Further, the research delineates five key values of public culture in smart city development and constructs a comprehensive evaluation framework comprising 31 indicators across six dimensions: supply, participation, innovation, fairness, suitability, and richness. Based on this framework, six recommendations are proposed for the development of public cultural initiatives in smart cities to enhance their positive impact on urban development, and to provide a new perspective for promoting the construction of a better and more warm-hearted smart city.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信