{"title":"Could body piercing be a cause of rheumatoid arthritis?","authors":"Martin James Seed","doi":"10.1016/j.mehy.2025.111577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be a chronic disabling condition despite modern immunosuppressive treatments. Better understanding of its aetiology is key to prevention and despite advances in immunogenetic knowledge the environmental triggers of RA remain uncertain. Following exploration of literature pertaining to the epidemiology and immunopathology of RA, the plausibility of a hypothesis that body piercing might have a causal role is presented. Indigenous North American (INA) populations exhibit markedly raised prevalence rates of RA and often have cultural traditions that involve body piercing in a variety of forms. Historical and archaeological evidence of early RA has consistency in timing with evidence of early human body piercing. The incidence of RA in the UK has increased in recent decades in parallel with an increase in frequency and diversity of body piercing behaviour. Body piercing is a form of somatic trauma resulting in a piercing cavity that houses a foreign object (jewellery) with hypothetical potential to stimulate autoreactive immunological processes. If the pierced tissue is mucosa there is potential for dysbiosis and breakdown in tolerance to modified proteins, thought to be an important early event in RA development. Piercing of cartilage has potential to cause autoreactivity to type II collagen and RA. A carefully designed case-control study might either refute or substantiate this hypothesis which could have significant implications for RA prevention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18425,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypotheses","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 111577"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987725000167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be a chronic disabling condition despite modern immunosuppressive treatments. Better understanding of its aetiology is key to prevention and despite advances in immunogenetic knowledge the environmental triggers of RA remain uncertain. Following exploration of literature pertaining to the epidemiology and immunopathology of RA, the plausibility of a hypothesis that body piercing might have a causal role is presented. Indigenous North American (INA) populations exhibit markedly raised prevalence rates of RA and often have cultural traditions that involve body piercing in a variety of forms. Historical and archaeological evidence of early RA has consistency in timing with evidence of early human body piercing. The incidence of RA in the UK has increased in recent decades in parallel with an increase in frequency and diversity of body piercing behaviour. Body piercing is a form of somatic trauma resulting in a piercing cavity that houses a foreign object (jewellery) with hypothetical potential to stimulate autoreactive immunological processes. If the pierced tissue is mucosa there is potential for dysbiosis and breakdown in tolerance to modified proteins, thought to be an important early event in RA development. Piercing of cartilage has potential to cause autoreactivity to type II collagen and RA. A carefully designed case-control study might either refute or substantiate this hypothesis which could have significant implications for RA prevention.
期刊介绍:
Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives. The Aims and Scope of Medical Hypotheses are no different now from what was proposed by the founder of the journal, the late Dr David Horrobin. In his introduction to the first issue of the Journal, he asks ''what sorts of papers will be published in Medical Hypotheses? and goes on to answer ''Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary''. (Horrobin DF, 1975 Ideas in Biomedical Science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 1975, Pages 1-2.). Medical Hypotheses was therefore launched, and still exists today, to give novel, radical new ideas and speculations in medicine open-minded consideration, opening the field to radical hypotheses which would be rejected by most conventional journals. Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.