Patient acceptance of emergency department-initiated buprenorphine and reasons for declining

Lindsey K. Jennings , Allison Smith , Angela Moreland , Ralph Ward , Sarah Gainey , Suzanne Lane , Olivia Holodnik , Katherine Scarpino , Karen Hartwell , Louise Haynes , Kathleen T. Brady , Kelly Barth
{"title":"Patient acceptance of emergency department-initiated buprenorphine and reasons for declining","authors":"Lindsey K. Jennings ,&nbsp;Allison Smith ,&nbsp;Angela Moreland ,&nbsp;Ralph Ward ,&nbsp;Sarah Gainey ,&nbsp;Suzanne Lane ,&nbsp;Olivia Holodnik ,&nbsp;Katherine Scarpino ,&nbsp;Karen Hartwell ,&nbsp;Louise Haynes ,&nbsp;Kathleen T. Brady ,&nbsp;Kelly Barth","doi":"10.1016/j.jemrpt.2025.100141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) reduces morbidity and mortality for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). Emergency department-initiated buprenorphine (EDIB) doubles retention in treatment at 30 days compared to outpatient referral alone. Little is known about acceptance rates of EDIB and reasons why patients decline this life-saving intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this study was to quantify the number of patients who initiate and decline buprenorphine in the ED and determine reasons for declination.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Seven SC EDs implemented EDIB programs that included ED-based peer recovery specialists (PRSs) to provide a brief intervention and assist with referral to outpatient treatment. The PRSs recorded patient interactions in a database including medical eligibility, if EDIB was provided, and the reason(s) why eligible patients declined EDIB. All eligible EDIB patients were entered in the PRS database and included in the study. Reasons for declining buprenorphine in eligible patients were analyzed with both fixed and free-text response options.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 2205 patients were eligible for EDIB. Of those, 963 (43.6 %) patients accepted buprenorphine and 1242 (56.3 %) declined. The most common reasons for declination were 1) the “patient preferring non-MOUD treatment” (53.4 %), 2) “Not ready/would like to think about it and/or check with other treatment providers or case workers” (16.7 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Over half of patients with OUD who were eligible for EDIB declined treatment, with the most common reason being preference for non-MOUD treatment. Given the success of MOUD for treatment of OUD, this topic requires further exploration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73546,"journal":{"name":"JEM reports","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEM reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773232025000057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) reduces morbidity and mortality for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). Emergency department-initiated buprenorphine (EDIB) doubles retention in treatment at 30 days compared to outpatient referral alone. Little is known about acceptance rates of EDIB and reasons why patients decline this life-saving intervention.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to quantify the number of patients who initiate and decline buprenorphine in the ED and determine reasons for declination.

Methods

Seven SC EDs implemented EDIB programs that included ED-based peer recovery specialists (PRSs) to provide a brief intervention and assist with referral to outpatient treatment. The PRSs recorded patient interactions in a database including medical eligibility, if EDIB was provided, and the reason(s) why eligible patients declined EDIB. All eligible EDIB patients were entered in the PRS database and included in the study. Reasons for declining buprenorphine in eligible patients were analyzed with both fixed and free-text response options.

Results

A total of 2205 patients were eligible for EDIB. Of those, 963 (43.6 %) patients accepted buprenorphine and 1242 (56.3 %) declined. The most common reasons for declination were 1) the “patient preferring non-MOUD treatment” (53.4 %), 2) “Not ready/would like to think about it and/or check with other treatment providers or case workers” (16.7 %).

Conclusions

Over half of patients with OUD who were eligible for EDIB declined treatment, with the most common reason being preference for non-MOUD treatment. Given the success of MOUD for treatment of OUD, this topic requires further exploration.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JEM reports
JEM reports Emergency Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
54 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信