{"title":"The impact of inaccurate property data in process modelling","authors":"José M.S. Fonseca , María Francisco Casal","doi":"10.1016/j.fluid.2024.114322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It is widely accepted that high-quality thermophysical property data are essential for the accurate modelling of chemical processes, both in the conceptual design phase of process development and in the optimization of existing processes. Unfortunately, over the last decades, the chemical industry has experienced the closure of many physical property data laboratories. This trend is not limited to experimental facilities, also applied thermodynamic groups have been significantly downsized or sometimes extinguished. Process engineers and modelling experts often take over the tasks of evaluating and testing the thermodynamic property packages used in their models. From the simulation industry, we see that it is increasingly common that users request out-of-the-box property data that can be used directly in their simulations. Estimation methods are sometimes being used without a proper acknowledgment of their limitations and associated uncertainties. We believe it is, therefore, important to raise awareness of how large the impact of potential property data errors on process modelling can be, more specifically on the modelling of typical downstream unit operations. In this work, we provide practical insights on this issue, by revisiting textbook examples and by delving into real-life industrial cases we have encountered over the years. Critical considerations on the direct use of data from large databanks and estimation methods are also presented. The last is particularly relevant, with an increasing number of research groups working on the development of machine learning methods as means to generate massive amounts of property data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12170,"journal":{"name":"Fluid Phase Equilibria","volume":"592 ","pages":"Article 114322"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fluid Phase Equilibria","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378381224002978","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
It is widely accepted that high-quality thermophysical property data are essential for the accurate modelling of chemical processes, both in the conceptual design phase of process development and in the optimization of existing processes. Unfortunately, over the last decades, the chemical industry has experienced the closure of many physical property data laboratories. This trend is not limited to experimental facilities, also applied thermodynamic groups have been significantly downsized or sometimes extinguished. Process engineers and modelling experts often take over the tasks of evaluating and testing the thermodynamic property packages used in their models. From the simulation industry, we see that it is increasingly common that users request out-of-the-box property data that can be used directly in their simulations. Estimation methods are sometimes being used without a proper acknowledgment of their limitations and associated uncertainties. We believe it is, therefore, important to raise awareness of how large the impact of potential property data errors on process modelling can be, more specifically on the modelling of typical downstream unit operations. In this work, we provide practical insights on this issue, by revisiting textbook examples and by delving into real-life industrial cases we have encountered over the years. Critical considerations on the direct use of data from large databanks and estimation methods are also presented. The last is particularly relevant, with an increasing number of research groups working on the development of machine learning methods as means to generate massive amounts of property data.
期刊介绍:
Fluid Phase Equilibria publishes high-quality papers dealing with experimental, theoretical, and applied research related to equilibrium and transport properties of fluids, solids, and interfaces. Subjects of interest include physical/phase and chemical equilibria; equilibrium and nonequilibrium thermophysical properties; fundamental thermodynamic relations; and stability. The systems central to the journal include pure substances and mixtures of organic and inorganic materials, including polymers, biochemicals, and surfactants with sufficient characterization of composition and purity for the results to be reproduced. Alloys are of interest only when thermodynamic studies are included, purely material studies will not be considered. In all cases, authors are expected to provide physical or chemical interpretations of the results.
Experimental research can include measurements under all conditions of temperature, pressure, and composition, including critical and supercritical. Measurements are to be associated with systems and conditions of fundamental or applied interest, and may not be only a collection of routine data, such as physical property or solubility measurements at limited pressures and temperatures close to ambient, or surfactant studies focussed strictly on micellisation or micelle structure. Papers reporting common data must be accompanied by new physical insights and/or contemporary or new theory or techniques.