Physical anthropomorphism (but not gender presentation) influences trust in household robots

Colin Holbrook , Umesh Krishnamurthy , Paul P. Maglio , Alan R. Wagner
{"title":"Physical anthropomorphism (but not gender presentation) influences trust in household robots","authors":"Colin Holbrook ,&nbsp;Umesh Krishnamurthy ,&nbsp;Paul P. Maglio ,&nbsp;Alan R. Wagner","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research explores anthropomorphism and gender presentation as prospective determinants of trust in household service robots with respect to care of objects (e.g., clothing, valuables), information (e.g., online passwords, credit card numbers), and living agents (e.g., pets, children). In Experiments 1 and 2, we compared trust in a humanoid robot presenting as male, female, or gender-neutral, finding no effects of gender presentation on any trust outcome. In Experiment 3, a fourth condition depicting a physically nonhumanoid robot was added. Relative to the humanoid conditions, participants reported less willingness to trust the nonhumanoid robot to care for their objects, personal information, or vulnerable agents; the reduced trust in care for objects or information was mediated by appraisals of the nonhumanoid as less intelligent and less likable, whereas the reduced trust in care of agents was mediated by appraisals of the nonhumanoid as less likable and less alive. In a parallel pattern, across all studies, participants’ appraisals of robots as intelligent tracked trust in them to take care of objects or information (but not agents), whereas appraisals of robots as likable and alive tracked trust in care of agents. The results are discussed as they inform past work examining effects of gender presentation and anthropomorphism on perceptions of, and trust in, robots.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research explores anthropomorphism and gender presentation as prospective determinants of trust in household service robots with respect to care of objects (e.g., clothing, valuables), information (e.g., online passwords, credit card numbers), and living agents (e.g., pets, children). In Experiments 1 and 2, we compared trust in a humanoid robot presenting as male, female, or gender-neutral, finding no effects of gender presentation on any trust outcome. In Experiment 3, a fourth condition depicting a physically nonhumanoid robot was added. Relative to the humanoid conditions, participants reported less willingness to trust the nonhumanoid robot to care for their objects, personal information, or vulnerable agents; the reduced trust in care for objects or information was mediated by appraisals of the nonhumanoid as less intelligent and less likable, whereas the reduced trust in care of agents was mediated by appraisals of the nonhumanoid as less likable and less alive. In a parallel pattern, across all studies, participants’ appraisals of robots as intelligent tracked trust in them to take care of objects or information (but not agents), whereas appraisals of robots as likable and alive tracked trust in care of agents. The results are discussed as they inform past work examining effects of gender presentation and anthropomorphism on perceptions of, and trust in, robots.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信