Gender Differences in Electronic Health Record Inbox Message Volumes Among Pediatric Surgeon Specialists

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Darren Ha , Nicole Russell , Kaitlin E. Olson , Gina M. Whitney , Ann M. Kulungowski , Emily McCourt , Kyle O. Rove
{"title":"Gender Differences in Electronic Health Record Inbox Message Volumes Among Pediatric Surgeon Specialists","authors":"Darren Ha ,&nbsp;Nicole Russell ,&nbsp;Kaitlin E. Olson ,&nbsp;Gina M. Whitney ,&nbsp;Ann M. Kulungowski ,&nbsp;Emily McCourt ,&nbsp;Kyle O. Rove","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Prior studies examined the relationship between physician sex and electronic health records (EHR) utilization patterns to assess for provider gender equity, although this has not been explored among pediatric surgical subspecialists. We hypothesized that female surgeons received more inbox messages and had longer message lengths compared to male surgeons.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Surgeons who performed at least five surgical procedures at a free-standing children's hospital between January 2021 and December 2022 were stratified based on sex. EHR utilization data were retrospectively extracted. Message types were restricted to those from patients, health care team members, or results, opting to omit other automated messages from the EHR that were not initiated by a person. Primary outcomes were number of inbox messages received adjusting for the volume of surgical cases performed and message length. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify outcome predictors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>41 female and 79 male surgeons were included in the final analysis. There was a median of 693 messages received by surgeons over the study period (median of 1.8 messages per surgeon per case). Male surgeons tended to be further out from training but there were no significant differences in terms of surgical case count or characteristics. Surgeon sex was a significant predictor of inbox message count in univariate analysis (incidence rate ratio 1.58 favoring female surgeons, p = 0.03), but not in multivariate analysis, after correcting for case complexity. Surgeon sex was not a significant predictor of message length in either univariate or multivariate analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Surgeon sex was not a significant predictor of inbox message count or message length among a cohort of pediatric surgical subspecialists. Ensuring gender equity with respect to EHR activities reaffirms our commitment to avoiding bias.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>III.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":"60 4","pages":"Article 162191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022346825000363","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Prior studies examined the relationship between physician sex and electronic health records (EHR) utilization patterns to assess for provider gender equity, although this has not been explored among pediatric surgical subspecialists. We hypothesized that female surgeons received more inbox messages and had longer message lengths compared to male surgeons.

Methods

Surgeons who performed at least five surgical procedures at a free-standing children's hospital between January 2021 and December 2022 were stratified based on sex. EHR utilization data were retrospectively extracted. Message types were restricted to those from patients, health care team members, or results, opting to omit other automated messages from the EHR that were not initiated by a person. Primary outcomes were number of inbox messages received adjusting for the volume of surgical cases performed and message length. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify outcome predictors.

Results

41 female and 79 male surgeons were included in the final analysis. There was a median of 693 messages received by surgeons over the study period (median of 1.8 messages per surgeon per case). Male surgeons tended to be further out from training but there were no significant differences in terms of surgical case count or characteristics. Surgeon sex was a significant predictor of inbox message count in univariate analysis (incidence rate ratio 1.58 favoring female surgeons, p = 0.03), but not in multivariate analysis, after correcting for case complexity. Surgeon sex was not a significant predictor of message length in either univariate or multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Surgeon sex was not a significant predictor of inbox message count or message length among a cohort of pediatric surgical subspecialists. Ensuring gender equity with respect to EHR activities reaffirms our commitment to avoiding bias.

Level of evidence

III.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信