No proportional relationship between shape and size of the femoral canal and the external proximal femur morphology in elderly patients

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Hidde D. Veldman , Ide C. Heyligers , Tim A.E.J. Boymans
{"title":"No proportional relationship between shape and size of the femoral canal and the external proximal femur morphology in elderly patients","authors":"Hidde D. Veldman ,&nbsp;Ide C. Heyligers ,&nbsp;Tim A.E.J. Boymans","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2025.01.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The proximal femur morphology changes with age, which may complicate the compatibility of contemporary cementless stem designs in very elderly patients. This study investigated the internal and external proximal femur morphology, correlated canal dimensions with external dimensions, and examined whether age-associated changes in the femoral canal and external morphology are related in subjects aged 80 years and older.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Three-dimensional models of human femora were reconstructed from computed tomographic (CT) scans of 90 very elderly subjects (mean 84 years, range 80–105 years). Morphological parameters describing the location of the femoral head center (FHC) (i.e. neck-shaft angle [NSA], mediolateral offset [ML-offset], and distance between lesser trochanter (LT) and FHC [LT-FHC]) and parameters describing the canal morphology (i.e. the cortices, canal dimensions, and canal flare index [CFI]) were measured. Regression and correlation analyses were performed in order to assess the relation between internal and external morphology.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No significant associations regarding dimensions nor geometry between internal and external femur morphology could be detected. Canal dimensions were not able to predict the external dimensions more accurately than the deviation between the individual value and the mean value for the total cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Based on these findings, proportional sizing of the cementless femoral component is not necessarily endorsed in very elderly patients, and age-associated changes of the femoral canal and external morphology do not appear to be related. However, further research is needed to evaluate the ability of contemporary non-modular cementless stems to anatomically reconstruct the proximal femur in very elderly patients specifically.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":"67 ","pages":"Pages 118-125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X25000182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The proximal femur morphology changes with age, which may complicate the compatibility of contemporary cementless stem designs in very elderly patients. This study investigated the internal and external proximal femur morphology, correlated canal dimensions with external dimensions, and examined whether age-associated changes in the femoral canal and external morphology are related in subjects aged 80 years and older.

Methods

Three-dimensional models of human femora were reconstructed from computed tomographic (CT) scans of 90 very elderly subjects (mean 84 years, range 80–105 years). Morphological parameters describing the location of the femoral head center (FHC) (i.e. neck-shaft angle [NSA], mediolateral offset [ML-offset], and distance between lesser trochanter (LT) and FHC [LT-FHC]) and parameters describing the canal morphology (i.e. the cortices, canal dimensions, and canal flare index [CFI]) were measured. Regression and correlation analyses were performed in order to assess the relation between internal and external morphology.

Results

No significant associations regarding dimensions nor geometry between internal and external femur morphology could be detected. Canal dimensions were not able to predict the external dimensions more accurately than the deviation between the individual value and the mean value for the total cohort.

Conclusions

Based on these findings, proportional sizing of the cementless femoral component is not necessarily endorsed in very elderly patients, and age-associated changes of the femoral canal and external morphology do not appear to be related. However, further research is needed to evaluate the ability of contemporary non-modular cementless stems to anatomically reconstruct the proximal femur in very elderly patients specifically.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
202
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信