Merilynn C. Schantz , Stuart P. Hardegree , Roger L. Sheley , Jon D. Bates , Jeremy J. James , John T. Abatzoglou , Kirk W. Davies
{"title":"Plant Production Forecasts Across Geographical Sites and Ecological States in Sagebrush-Steppe Plant Communities","authors":"Merilynn C. Schantz , Stuart P. Hardegree , Roger L. Sheley , Jon D. Bates , Jeremy J. James , John T. Abatzoglou , Kirk W. Davies","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2024.07.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate is the principal driver of plant production across all rangeland ecosystems. Monthly or seasonal forecasts of rangeland plant production could provide valuable management information pertaining to livestock stocking rates, restoration planning, wildfire fuel loads, and wildlife management. In the sagebrush steppe ecoregion, plant production is dependent upon climate but also varies by geographic location and the ecological state or dominant plant community. In this study, we used retrospective seasonal climate forecasts and plant production models to determine the utility of monthly or seasonal forecasting (with up to 7-month lead times) across both geographical sites and ecological states. This study was conducted in 45 intact late-seral sagebrush steppe sites over a 10-year period across a 50,000 km<sup>2</sup> area in southeastern Oregon. Research sites were sorted into five geographical sites and into five ecological states. The objectives of this study were to (1) model plant functional group responses to actual and forecasted climate across time and space; (2) determine plant production forecast skill for lead times of up to 7 months; and (3) differentiate plant production model and forecast skill among both geographical sites and ecological states. We found that plant production models and forecasts were able to identify key functional group responses to precipitation and temperature inputs. We also determined that climate and plant production forecasts could be used to produce significant monthly plant production forecasts for lead-times of up to 7-months for all site, state, and plant functional groupings. We also determined that forecasts of total plant production by ecological state were significantly better than forecasts based on geographical sites. Forecasting by ecological state could lead to better rangeland management decisions as it matches management inputs with inherent site conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":"98 ","pages":"Pages 609-619"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742424001209","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Climate is the principal driver of plant production across all rangeland ecosystems. Monthly or seasonal forecasts of rangeland plant production could provide valuable management information pertaining to livestock stocking rates, restoration planning, wildfire fuel loads, and wildlife management. In the sagebrush steppe ecoregion, plant production is dependent upon climate but also varies by geographic location and the ecological state or dominant plant community. In this study, we used retrospective seasonal climate forecasts and plant production models to determine the utility of monthly or seasonal forecasting (with up to 7-month lead times) across both geographical sites and ecological states. This study was conducted in 45 intact late-seral sagebrush steppe sites over a 10-year period across a 50,000 km2 area in southeastern Oregon. Research sites were sorted into five geographical sites and into five ecological states. The objectives of this study were to (1) model plant functional group responses to actual and forecasted climate across time and space; (2) determine plant production forecast skill for lead times of up to 7 months; and (3) differentiate plant production model and forecast skill among both geographical sites and ecological states. We found that plant production models and forecasts were able to identify key functional group responses to precipitation and temperature inputs. We also determined that climate and plant production forecasts could be used to produce significant monthly plant production forecasts for lead-times of up to 7-months for all site, state, and plant functional groupings. We also determined that forecasts of total plant production by ecological state were significantly better than forecasts based on geographical sites. Forecasting by ecological state could lead to better rangeland management decisions as it matches management inputs with inherent site conditions.
期刊介绍:
Rangeland Ecology & Management publishes all topics-including ecology, management, socioeconomic and policy-pertaining to global rangelands. The journal''s mission is to inform academics, ecosystem managers and policy makers of science-based information to promote sound rangeland stewardship. Author submissions are published in five manuscript categories: original research papers, high-profile forum topics, concept syntheses, as well as research and technical notes.
Rangelands represent approximately 50% of the Earth''s land area and provision multiple ecosystem services for large human populations. This expansive and diverse land area functions as coupled human-ecological systems. Knowledge of both social and biophysical system components and their interactions represent the foundation for informed rangeland stewardship. Rangeland Ecology & Management uniquely integrates information from multiple system components to address current and pending challenges confronting global rangelands.