Olivia S. Pratt , Luc G. Elliott , Margaux Haon , Shahram Mesdaghi , Rebecca M. Price , Adam J. Simpkin , Daniel J. Rigden
{"title":"AlphaFold 2, but not AlphaFold 3, predicts confident but unrealistic β-solenoid structures for repeat proteins","authors":"Olivia S. Pratt , Luc G. Elliott , Margaux Haon , Shahram Mesdaghi , Rebecca M. Price , Adam J. Simpkin , Daniel J. Rigden","doi":"10.1016/j.csbj.2025.01.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>AlphaFold 2 (AF2) has revolutionised protein structure prediction but, like any new tool, its performance on specific classes of targets, especially those potentially under-represented in its training data, merits attention. Prompted by a highly confident prediction for a biologically meaningless, randomly permuted repeat sequence, we assessed AF2 performance on sequences composed of perfect repeats of random sequences of different lengths. AF2 frequently folds such sequences into β-solenoids which, while ascribed high confidence, contain unusual and implausible features such as internally stacked and uncompensated charged residues. A number of sequences confidently predicted as β-solenoids are predicted by other advanced methods as intrinsically disordered. The instability of some predictions is demonstrated by molecular dynamics. Importantly, other deep learning-based structure prediction tools predict different structures or β-solenoids with much lower confidence suggesting that AF2 alone has an unreasonable tendency to predict confident but unrealistic β-solenoids for perfect repeat sequences. The potential implications for structure prediction of natural (near-)perfect sequence repeat proteins are also explored.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10715,"journal":{"name":"Computational and structural biotechnology journal","volume":"27 ","pages":"Pages 467-477"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational and structural biotechnology journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037025000200","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AlphaFold 2 (AF2) has revolutionised protein structure prediction but, like any new tool, its performance on specific classes of targets, especially those potentially under-represented in its training data, merits attention. Prompted by a highly confident prediction for a biologically meaningless, randomly permuted repeat sequence, we assessed AF2 performance on sequences composed of perfect repeats of random sequences of different lengths. AF2 frequently folds such sequences into β-solenoids which, while ascribed high confidence, contain unusual and implausible features such as internally stacked and uncompensated charged residues. A number of sequences confidently predicted as β-solenoids are predicted by other advanced methods as intrinsically disordered. The instability of some predictions is demonstrated by molecular dynamics. Importantly, other deep learning-based structure prediction tools predict different structures or β-solenoids with much lower confidence suggesting that AF2 alone has an unreasonable tendency to predict confident but unrealistic β-solenoids for perfect repeat sequences. The potential implications for structure prediction of natural (near-)perfect sequence repeat proteins are also explored.
期刊介绍:
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (CSBJ) is an online gold open access journal publishing research articles and reviews after full peer review. All articles are published, without barriers to access, immediately upon acceptance. The journal places a strong emphasis on functional and mechanistic understanding of how molecular components in a biological process work together through the application of computational methods. Structural data may provide such insights, but they are not a pre-requisite for publication in the journal. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to:
Structure and function of proteins, nucleic acids and other macromolecules
Structure and function of multi-component complexes
Protein folding, processing and degradation
Enzymology
Computational and structural studies of plant systems
Microbial Informatics
Genomics
Proteomics
Metabolomics
Algorithms and Hypothesis in Bioinformatics
Mathematical and Theoretical Biology
Computational Chemistry and Drug Discovery
Microscopy and Molecular Imaging
Nanotechnology
Systems and Synthetic Biology