Using approximate matching and machine learning to uncover malicious activity in logs

IF 4.8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Rory Flynn, Oluwafemi Olukoya
{"title":"Using approximate matching and machine learning to uncover malicious activity in logs","authors":"Rory Flynn,&nbsp;Oluwafemi Olukoya","doi":"10.1016/j.cose.2025.104312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid expansion of digital services has led to an unprecedented surge in digital data production. Logs play a critical role in this vast volume of data as digital records capture notable events within systems or processes. Large-scale systems generate an overwhelming number of logs, making manual examination by analysts infeasible during critical events or attacks. While hashes, whether cryptographic or fuzzy, are widely used in digital forensics because they serve as the foundation for software integrity and validation, authentication and identification, similarity analysis, and fragment detection, this study investigates and extends the use of approximate matching (AM) algorithms in semi-structured data, such as logs. Existing AM algorithms such as <em>ssdeep</em>, <em>sdhash</em>, <em>TLSH</em>, and <em>LZJD</em> struggle particularly with semi-structured data due to the size of the input data being comparatively small, with syntactical and structural information comprising a significant amount of the data. We present a novel approximate matching algorithm for application across a range of semi-structured data types, which requires no knowledge of the underlying data structure. The algorithm produces digests that serve as input to a machine learning classifier, classifying the behaviour of the underlying logs the hashes represent. Experimental results on a benchmark dataset of IoT network traffic show that the proposed framework can correctly discern malicious logs from benign records with a 95% accuracy, with an F1 score of 0.98. The behaviour of the records deemed malicious was then correctly identified with a 99% accuracy when evaluated using a test data set, producing an average F1 score of 0.99. Additionally, we demonstrate that this approach provides a faster and lightweight framework to perform classification with high accuracy on a list of logs, producing those indicative of an attack for review.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51004,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Security","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 104312"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Security","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016740482500001X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid expansion of digital services has led to an unprecedented surge in digital data production. Logs play a critical role in this vast volume of data as digital records capture notable events within systems or processes. Large-scale systems generate an overwhelming number of logs, making manual examination by analysts infeasible during critical events or attacks. While hashes, whether cryptographic or fuzzy, are widely used in digital forensics because they serve as the foundation for software integrity and validation, authentication and identification, similarity analysis, and fragment detection, this study investigates and extends the use of approximate matching (AM) algorithms in semi-structured data, such as logs. Existing AM algorithms such as ssdeep, sdhash, TLSH, and LZJD struggle particularly with semi-structured data due to the size of the input data being comparatively small, with syntactical and structural information comprising a significant amount of the data. We present a novel approximate matching algorithm for application across a range of semi-structured data types, which requires no knowledge of the underlying data structure. The algorithm produces digests that serve as input to a machine learning classifier, classifying the behaviour of the underlying logs the hashes represent. Experimental results on a benchmark dataset of IoT network traffic show that the proposed framework can correctly discern malicious logs from benign records with a 95% accuracy, with an F1 score of 0.98. The behaviour of the records deemed malicious was then correctly identified with a 99% accuracy when evaluated using a test data set, producing an average F1 score of 0.99. Additionally, we demonstrate that this approach provides a faster and lightweight framework to perform classification with high accuracy on a list of logs, producing those indicative of an attack for review.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Security
Computers & Security 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
365
审稿时长
10.7 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Security is the most respected technical journal in the IT security field. With its high-profile editorial board and informative regular features and columns, the journal is essential reading for IT security professionals around the world. Computers & Security provides you with a unique blend of leading edge research and sound practical management advice. It is aimed at the professional involved with computer security, audit, control and data integrity in all sectors - industry, commerce and academia. Recognized worldwide as THE primary source of reference for applied research and technical expertise it is your first step to fully secure systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信