“Alexa, how do you protect my privacy?” A quantitative study of user preferences and requirements about smart speaker privacy settings

IF 4.8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Luca Hernández Acosta, Delphine Reinhardt
{"title":"“Alexa, how do you protect my privacy?” A quantitative study of user preferences and requirements about smart speaker privacy settings","authors":"Luca Hernández Acosta,&nbsp;Delphine Reinhardt","doi":"10.1016/j.cose.2024.104302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Voice assistants are becoming increasingly popular. While users may benefit from the convenience of voice interactions, the use of voice assistants raises privacy issues. To address them, existing voice assistants propose some privacy settings. However, we are lacking knowledge about (1) which privacy settings are important to users, (2) what are their preferences about their application, and (3) what are their requirements beyond existing privacy settings. Gaining such knowledge is important to understand why users may not use these settings and to identify which settings should be introduced to allow users to better protect their privacy. To this end, we have conducted a quantitative online study with 1,103 German smart speaker owners. Detailed insights are provided into how beliefs about data handling practices, usage of existing privacy settings, affinity for technology interaction, and privacy attitudes vary depending on the brand of smart speakers used by participants. These findings reveal discrepancies in user trust and preferences across different manufacturers. Additionally, statistical evaluations, including effect size calculations, are introduced, alongside expanded results with detailed explanations to enhance the contextual understanding of the findings. The study provides recommendations for manufacturers and policymakers to improve transparency, usability, and education on privacy settings. Practical guidelines for privacy-preserving features are included, advancing understanding of user needs and aiding in the design of better solutions. In addition to partly replicating findings obtained with different samples, the results show that the currently available privacy settings do not fully cover user requirements and indicate a general desire for more transparency and control over the collected data. Our results hence serve as basis for designing future privacy-preserving solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51004,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Security","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 104302"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Security","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167404824006084","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Voice assistants are becoming increasingly popular. While users may benefit from the convenience of voice interactions, the use of voice assistants raises privacy issues. To address them, existing voice assistants propose some privacy settings. However, we are lacking knowledge about (1) which privacy settings are important to users, (2) what are their preferences about their application, and (3) what are their requirements beyond existing privacy settings. Gaining such knowledge is important to understand why users may not use these settings and to identify which settings should be introduced to allow users to better protect their privacy. To this end, we have conducted a quantitative online study with 1,103 German smart speaker owners. Detailed insights are provided into how beliefs about data handling practices, usage of existing privacy settings, affinity for technology interaction, and privacy attitudes vary depending on the brand of smart speakers used by participants. These findings reveal discrepancies in user trust and preferences across different manufacturers. Additionally, statistical evaluations, including effect size calculations, are introduced, alongside expanded results with detailed explanations to enhance the contextual understanding of the findings. The study provides recommendations for manufacturers and policymakers to improve transparency, usability, and education on privacy settings. Practical guidelines for privacy-preserving features are included, advancing understanding of user needs and aiding in the design of better solutions. In addition to partly replicating findings obtained with different samples, the results show that the currently available privacy settings do not fully cover user requirements and indicate a general desire for more transparency and control over the collected data. Our results hence serve as basis for designing future privacy-preserving solutions.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Security
Computers & Security 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
365
审稿时长
10.7 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Security is the most respected technical journal in the IT security field. With its high-profile editorial board and informative regular features and columns, the journal is essential reading for IT security professionals around the world. Computers & Security provides you with a unique blend of leading edge research and sound practical management advice. It is aimed at the professional involved with computer security, audit, control and data integrity in all sectors - industry, commerce and academia. Recognized worldwide as THE primary source of reference for applied research and technical expertise it is your first step to fully secure systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信