{"title":"“Alexa, how do you protect my privacy?” A quantitative study of user preferences and requirements about smart speaker privacy settings","authors":"Luca Hernández Acosta, Delphine Reinhardt","doi":"10.1016/j.cose.2024.104302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Voice assistants are becoming increasingly popular. While users may benefit from the convenience of voice interactions, the use of voice assistants raises privacy issues. To address them, existing voice assistants propose some privacy settings. However, we are lacking knowledge about (1) which privacy settings are important to users, (2) what are their preferences about their application, and (3) what are their requirements beyond existing privacy settings. Gaining such knowledge is important to understand why users may not use these settings and to identify which settings should be introduced to allow users to better protect their privacy. To this end, we have conducted a quantitative online study with 1,103 German smart speaker owners. Detailed insights are provided into how beliefs about data handling practices, usage of existing privacy settings, affinity for technology interaction, and privacy attitudes vary depending on the brand of smart speakers used by participants. These findings reveal discrepancies in user trust and preferences across different manufacturers. Additionally, statistical evaluations, including effect size calculations, are introduced, alongside expanded results with detailed explanations to enhance the contextual understanding of the findings. The study provides recommendations for manufacturers and policymakers to improve transparency, usability, and education on privacy settings. Practical guidelines for privacy-preserving features are included, advancing understanding of user needs and aiding in the design of better solutions. In addition to partly replicating findings obtained with different samples, the results show that the currently available privacy settings do not fully cover user requirements and indicate a general desire for more transparency and control over the collected data. Our results hence serve as basis for designing future privacy-preserving solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51004,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Security","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 104302"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Security","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167404824006084","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Voice assistants are becoming increasingly popular. While users may benefit from the convenience of voice interactions, the use of voice assistants raises privacy issues. To address them, existing voice assistants propose some privacy settings. However, we are lacking knowledge about (1) which privacy settings are important to users, (2) what are their preferences about their application, and (3) what are their requirements beyond existing privacy settings. Gaining such knowledge is important to understand why users may not use these settings and to identify which settings should be introduced to allow users to better protect their privacy. To this end, we have conducted a quantitative online study with 1,103 German smart speaker owners. Detailed insights are provided into how beliefs about data handling practices, usage of existing privacy settings, affinity for technology interaction, and privacy attitudes vary depending on the brand of smart speakers used by participants. These findings reveal discrepancies in user trust and preferences across different manufacturers. Additionally, statistical evaluations, including effect size calculations, are introduced, alongside expanded results with detailed explanations to enhance the contextual understanding of the findings. The study provides recommendations for manufacturers and policymakers to improve transparency, usability, and education on privacy settings. Practical guidelines for privacy-preserving features are included, advancing understanding of user needs and aiding in the design of better solutions. In addition to partly replicating findings obtained with different samples, the results show that the currently available privacy settings do not fully cover user requirements and indicate a general desire for more transparency and control over the collected data. Our results hence serve as basis for designing future privacy-preserving solutions.
期刊介绍:
Computers & Security is the most respected technical journal in the IT security field. With its high-profile editorial board and informative regular features and columns, the journal is essential reading for IT security professionals around the world.
Computers & Security provides you with a unique blend of leading edge research and sound practical management advice. It is aimed at the professional involved with computer security, audit, control and data integrity in all sectors - industry, commerce and academia. Recognized worldwide as THE primary source of reference for applied research and technical expertise it is your first step to fully secure systems.