Localizing the education development research agenda in the Global South: The case of GPE KIX

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Leanne M. Cameron , Serhiy Kovalchuk , Sophia M. D’Angelo , Aissata Assane Igodoe
{"title":"Localizing the education development research agenda in the Global South: The case of GPE KIX","authors":"Leanne M. Cameron ,&nbsp;Serhiy Kovalchuk ,&nbsp;Sophia M. D’Angelo ,&nbsp;Aissata Assane Igodoe","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent efforts in decolonization and localization have been influential in reshaping the long-standing norms of international development, whereby large-scale funders and actors in the Global North have shaped education development research agendas in low- and middle-income countries. This influence often stems from decision-making processes that appear opaque and mono-directional, flowing from North to South. Adopting a localization perspective, this article examines the attempts of a large-scale international development program—the Global Partnership for Education (GPE) Knowledge and Innovation Exchange (KIX)—to reverse this trend by engaging education stakeholders in over 60 low- and middle-income countries to inform its research and implementation activities and thereby localize the education development research agenda. It draws on reflections from key project implementers and details the process undertaken to ensure that the countries involved had opportunities to shape the GPE KIX research agenda and implementation activities, based on their national education priorities. The article explores practical challenges encountered in the effort to localize the program’s agenda, including conducting online, participatory data collection while navigating diverse language needs, time zones constraints and budget limitations. It addresses methodological dilemmas encountered, examining power dynamics, researcher and institutional positionality, the role of gatekeepers, tensions related to participant identities and biases, spaces of pushback, the use of research evidence and features of project design. Drawing on the experience of GPE KIX, the article discusses implications for future efforts to localize education development research agendas in the Global South.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 103207"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059325000057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent efforts in decolonization and localization have been influential in reshaping the long-standing norms of international development, whereby large-scale funders and actors in the Global North have shaped education development research agendas in low- and middle-income countries. This influence often stems from decision-making processes that appear opaque and mono-directional, flowing from North to South. Adopting a localization perspective, this article examines the attempts of a large-scale international development program—the Global Partnership for Education (GPE) Knowledge and Innovation Exchange (KIX)—to reverse this trend by engaging education stakeholders in over 60 low- and middle-income countries to inform its research and implementation activities and thereby localize the education development research agenda. It draws on reflections from key project implementers and details the process undertaken to ensure that the countries involved had opportunities to shape the GPE KIX research agenda and implementation activities, based on their national education priorities. The article explores practical challenges encountered in the effort to localize the program’s agenda, including conducting online, participatory data collection while navigating diverse language needs, time zones constraints and budget limitations. It addresses methodological dilemmas encountered, examining power dynamics, researcher and institutional positionality, the role of gatekeepers, tensions related to participant identities and biases, spaces of pushback, the use of research evidence and features of project design. Drawing on the experience of GPE KIX, the article discusses implications for future efforts to localize education development research agendas in the Global South.
发展中国家教育发展研究议程的本土化:以GPE KIX为例
最近在非殖民化和地方化方面的努力对重塑长期存在的国际发展规范产生了影响,全球北方的大型资助者和行动者据此塑造了中低收入国家的教育发展研究议程。这种影响往往源于似乎不透明和单向的、从北到南的决策过程。本文从本土化的角度考察了一项大型国际发展计划——全球教育伙伴关系(GPE)知识与创新交流(KIX)——的尝试。该计划旨在通过让60多个低收入和中等收入国家的教育利益相关者参与其研究和实施活动,从而将教育发展研究议程本土化,从而扭转这一趋势。它借鉴了主要项目执行者的反思,并详细介绍了为确保有关国家有机会根据其国家教育优先事项制定全球教育战略研究议程和实施活动而开展的进程。本文探讨了在努力实现项目议程本地化过程中遇到的实际挑战,包括进行在线、参与式数据收集,同时应对不同的语言需求、时区限制和预算限制。它解决了遇到的方法论困境,检查权力动态,研究人员和机构的位置,看门人的角色,与参与者身份和偏见相关的紧张关系,阻力空间,研究证据的使用和项目设计的特点。根据GPE KIX的经验,本文讨论了未来发展中国家教育发展研究议程本地化工作的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Development
International Journal of Educational Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Educational Development is to foster critical debate about the role that education plays in development. IJED seeks both to develop new theoretical insights into the education-development relationship and new understandings of the extent and nature of educational change in diverse settings. It stresses the importance of understanding the interplay of local, national, regional and global contexts and dynamics in shaping education and development. Orthodox notions of development as being about growth, industrialisation or poverty reduction are increasingly questioned. There are competing accounts that stress the human dimensions of development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信