Envisioning the future of youth justice: A focus group study with youth, family, frontline staff, and subject experts

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Julia Lesnick , Laura S. Abrams , Kassandra Angel , Elizabeth S. Barnert
{"title":"Envisioning the future of youth justice: A focus group study with youth, family, frontline staff, and subject experts","authors":"Julia Lesnick ,&nbsp;Laura S. Abrams ,&nbsp;Kassandra Angel ,&nbsp;Elizabeth S. Barnert","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.108097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite a wave of recent progressive reforms to the US juvenile legal system (JLS), ongoing concerns about punitive, inequitable, and developmentally inappropriate aspects of these systems persist, and the path forward is highly contested. Drawing on the concept of claim-making from scholarship on contentious politics, this study compared a diverse group of actors’ priorities for the future of youth justice. A series of 9 focus groups were conducted with 92 participants from multiple regions of the United States, including 1) frontline JLS staff, 2) system-impacted youth and their families, and 3) JLS professionals/subject experts. The analysis produced one overarching theme: youth justice systems should build a pathway for youth success where the larger community ensures youth can access resources to thrive. Under this overarching theme, five sub-themes describe participants’ claims about how to enact this goal: “challenge criminalization of youth,” “strengthen the surrounding environment,” “humanize youth,” “teach accountability,” and “implement intentional staffing.” Two sub-themes were contentious in the subject expert/professional groups (challenge criminalization, strengthen surrounding environment) and two varied in salience between groups (challenge criminalization, implement intentional staffing). Results point towards a shared vision of the larger community creating a youth justice system that guides youth towards long-term success, and to some tensions and diverging priorities about specific elements of system change. Findings can inform directions for coalition building, dialogue, and continued research on institutional change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 108097"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740924006698","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite a wave of recent progressive reforms to the US juvenile legal system (JLS), ongoing concerns about punitive, inequitable, and developmentally inappropriate aspects of these systems persist, and the path forward is highly contested. Drawing on the concept of claim-making from scholarship on contentious politics, this study compared a diverse group of actors’ priorities for the future of youth justice. A series of 9 focus groups were conducted with 92 participants from multiple regions of the United States, including 1) frontline JLS staff, 2) system-impacted youth and their families, and 3) JLS professionals/subject experts. The analysis produced one overarching theme: youth justice systems should build a pathway for youth success where the larger community ensures youth can access resources to thrive. Under this overarching theme, five sub-themes describe participants’ claims about how to enact this goal: “challenge criminalization of youth,” “strengthen the surrounding environment,” “humanize youth,” “teach accountability,” and “implement intentional staffing.” Two sub-themes were contentious in the subject expert/professional groups (challenge criminalization, strengthen surrounding environment) and two varied in salience between groups (challenge criminalization, implement intentional staffing). Results point towards a shared vision of the larger community creating a youth justice system that guides youth towards long-term success, and to some tensions and diverging priorities about specific elements of system change. Findings can inform directions for coalition building, dialogue, and continued research on institutional change.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
303
期刊介绍: Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信