Ultimate strength of deck grillages recovered from a decommissioned warship

IF 4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Malcolm Smith , Ken Nahshon , Teresa Magoga , Radu Chiritoiu , Prahshanth Sivapalan
{"title":"Ultimate strength of deck grillages recovered from a decommissioned warship","authors":"Malcolm Smith ,&nbsp;Ken Nahshon ,&nbsp;Teresa Magoga ,&nbsp;Radu Chiritoiu ,&nbsp;Prahshanth Sivapalan","doi":"10.1016/j.marstruc.2024.103764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cyclic ultimate strength testing of four deck grillage structures recovered from a decommissioned naval destroyer was conducted at Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division to explore the behavior of in-service ship structure and generate data for modeling and simulation comparisons. The test articles spanned 3 or 4 complete frame bays of the original structure and included features typical of ship construction such as non-uniform thickness and frame spacing, hatch openings, and weld seams. Prior to strength testing, thickness and shape measurements were conducted on all test specimens, including full LiDAR scanning, and material properties were measured from coupons recovered from each grillage. Measured ultimate strength, post-collapse strength, load-shortening response collapse mode and location are compared with nonlinear FEA and Smith's method predictions. Numerical assessments were performed in two modelling configurations: nominal configuration, using design scantlings and material properties; and the actual configuration, using all pre-test measured data. Nonlinear FEA predictions indicate interframe collapse modes in a central frame bay, consistent with the test results, although differences in the collapse location and collapse mode of individual stiffeners are observed. Prediction of ultimate and post-collapse strength is shown to be greatly improved in the actual configuration, in particular when using measured material properties. Agreement between predictions and measured ultimate strengths is good, and Smith's method strength predictions are found to be comparable to FEA predictions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49879,"journal":{"name":"Marine Structures","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 103764"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951833924001928","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cyclic ultimate strength testing of four deck grillage structures recovered from a decommissioned naval destroyer was conducted at Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division to explore the behavior of in-service ship structure and generate data for modeling and simulation comparisons. The test articles spanned 3 or 4 complete frame bays of the original structure and included features typical of ship construction such as non-uniform thickness and frame spacing, hatch openings, and weld seams. Prior to strength testing, thickness and shape measurements were conducted on all test specimens, including full LiDAR scanning, and material properties were measured from coupons recovered from each grillage. Measured ultimate strength, post-collapse strength, load-shortening response collapse mode and location are compared with nonlinear FEA and Smith's method predictions. Numerical assessments were performed in two modelling configurations: nominal configuration, using design scantlings and material properties; and the actual configuration, using all pre-test measured data. Nonlinear FEA predictions indicate interframe collapse modes in a central frame bay, consistent with the test results, although differences in the collapse location and collapse mode of individual stiffeners are observed. Prediction of ultimate and post-collapse strength is shown to be greatly improved in the actual configuration, in particular when using measured material properties. Agreement between predictions and measured ultimate strengths is good, and Smith's method strength predictions are found to be comparable to FEA predictions.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marine Structures
Marine Structures 工程技术-工程:海洋
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
157
审稿时长
6.4 months
期刊介绍: This journal aims to provide a medium for presentation and discussion of the latest developments in research, design, fabrication and in-service experience relating to marine structures, i.e., all structures of steel, concrete, light alloy or composite construction having an interface with the sea, including ships, fixed and mobile offshore platforms, submarine and submersibles, pipelines, subsea systems for shallow and deep ocean operations and coastal structures such as piers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信