{"title":"Power distribution bias from equilibrium xenon effects when insufficient neutron histories per cycle are used in Monte Carlo simulation of CANDU6","authors":"Yeseul Seo, Arief Rahman Hakim, Douglas A. Fynan","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2024.111027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the impact of insufficient neutron histories per cycle (<em>N</em>) on power distribution accuracy in Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of CANDU reactors when using equilibrium-xenon algorithms. We demonstrate that using an insufficient <em>N</em> with equilibrium xenon introduces significant bias into the power distribution. The observed bias is systematic with a strong flattening affect where power is suppressed in high-power bundles and increased in low-power bundles by up to several percent beyond the real physical flattening effect of xenon on the three-dimensional power distribution. At least <span><math><mrow><mn>5</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mn>6</mn></msup></mrow></math></span> to <span><math><msup><mn>10</mn><mn>7</mn></msup></math></span> <em>N</em> must be used for criticality simulation with the 1/8th symmetric CANDU6 model studied to suppress the spatial power tilts and eliminate the bias. This recommended <em>N</em> is orders of magnitude larger than <em>N</em> used in previous full-core Monte Carlo simulations of CANDU reactors. A preliminary analysis of the CANDU bundle power tally variances shows there is an underestimation of the real variance by approximately a factor of two.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 111027"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030645492400690X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines the impact of insufficient neutron histories per cycle (N) on power distribution accuracy in Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of CANDU reactors when using equilibrium-xenon algorithms. We demonstrate that using an insufficient N with equilibrium xenon introduces significant bias into the power distribution. The observed bias is systematic with a strong flattening affect where power is suppressed in high-power bundles and increased in low-power bundles by up to several percent beyond the real physical flattening effect of xenon on the three-dimensional power distribution. At least to N must be used for criticality simulation with the 1/8th symmetric CANDU6 model studied to suppress the spatial power tilts and eliminate the bias. This recommended N is orders of magnitude larger than N used in previous full-core Monte Carlo simulations of CANDU reactors. A preliminary analysis of the CANDU bundle power tally variances shows there is an underestimation of the real variance by approximately a factor of two.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.