Detection of a late autumn Karenia papilionacea bloom in Virginia, USA, coastal waters

IF 5.5 1区 生物学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Jennifer L. Wolny , Michelle C. Tomlinson , Todd A. Egerton , Leah A. Gibala-Smith , Chyna B. Law , Ellen Gortz , Emma W. Brooks , Edward B. Whereat , Margaret R. Mulholland
{"title":"Detection of a late autumn Karenia papilionacea bloom in Virginia, USA, coastal waters","authors":"Jennifer L. Wolny ,&nbsp;Michelle C. Tomlinson ,&nbsp;Todd A. Egerton ,&nbsp;Leah A. Gibala-Smith ,&nbsp;Chyna B. Law ,&nbsp;Ellen Gortz ,&nbsp;Emma W. Brooks ,&nbsp;Edward B. Whereat ,&nbsp;Margaret R. Mulholland","doi":"10.1016/j.hal.2025.102805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A late autumn <em>Karenia papilionacea</em> bloom was detected within Virginia, USA shellfish harvesting areas in mid-November 2023. Using Imaging FlowCytobot (IFCB) data collected during the Northeast Fisheries Science Center Ecosystem Monitoring October – November 2023 cruise, we were able to document a larger <em>Karenia</em> bloom composed of <em>K. papilionacea, K. brevis</em>-like<em>, K. mikimotoi,</em> and <em>Karenia</em> sp. #3 cells offshore of Virginia three weeks prior to detection inshore. Both <em>K. papilionacea</em> and <em>K. mikimotoi</em> were detected in Virginia state waters (including shellfish harvesting areas) and offshore waters of the Delmarva Peninsula, whereas <em>K. brevis</em>-like and <em>Karenia</em> sp. #3 were only detected offshore. The IFCB data showed that along the cruise track the greatest cell concentrations were east of the Chesapeake Bay mouth on November 1, 2023. However, when conducting a match-up assessment of IFCB <em>in situ</em> data with Sentinel-3 Ocean and Land Colour Instrument (OLCI) satellite imagery using the Red Band Difference (RBD) algorithm, the majority of the bloom was undetected. By comparing <em>in situ</em> match-ups and RBD imagery with NOAA-20 satellite's Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) chlorophyll anomaly product we hypothesize that the <em>in situ</em> sampling occurred along the bloom's edge, where cell concentrations were at or below the limit of satellite detection, and/or this particular <em>Karenia</em> bloom was either not fluorescing, expressing relatively low solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence, or occurring at depths below satellite detection. For this bloom event, the IFCB dataset was also used as a training tool for students learning microscopy-based phytoplankton identification in a virtual environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12897,"journal":{"name":"Harmful Algae","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 102805"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harmful Algae","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568988325000083","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A late autumn Karenia papilionacea bloom was detected within Virginia, USA shellfish harvesting areas in mid-November 2023. Using Imaging FlowCytobot (IFCB) data collected during the Northeast Fisheries Science Center Ecosystem Monitoring October – November 2023 cruise, we were able to document a larger Karenia bloom composed of K. papilionacea, K. brevis-like, K. mikimotoi, and Karenia sp. #3 cells offshore of Virginia three weeks prior to detection inshore. Both K. papilionacea and K. mikimotoi were detected in Virginia state waters (including shellfish harvesting areas) and offshore waters of the Delmarva Peninsula, whereas K. brevis-like and Karenia sp. #3 were only detected offshore. The IFCB data showed that along the cruise track the greatest cell concentrations were east of the Chesapeake Bay mouth on November 1, 2023. However, when conducting a match-up assessment of IFCB in situ data with Sentinel-3 Ocean and Land Colour Instrument (OLCI) satellite imagery using the Red Band Difference (RBD) algorithm, the majority of the bloom was undetected. By comparing in situ match-ups and RBD imagery with NOAA-20 satellite's Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) chlorophyll anomaly product we hypothesize that the in situ sampling occurred along the bloom's edge, where cell concentrations were at or below the limit of satellite detection, and/or this particular Karenia bloom was either not fluorescing, expressing relatively low solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence, or occurring at depths below satellite detection. For this bloom event, the IFCB dataset was also used as a training tool for students learning microscopy-based phytoplankton identification in a virtual environment.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Harmful Algae
Harmful Algae 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: This journal provides a forum to promote knowledge of harmful microalgae and macroalgae, including cyanobacteria, as well as monitoring, management and control of these organisms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信