Unmasking the hidden credential leaks in password managers and VPN clients

IF 4.8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Efstratios Chatzoglou , Vyron Kampourakis , Zisis Tsiatsikas , Georgios Karopoulos , Georgios Kambourakis
{"title":"Unmasking the hidden credential leaks in password managers and VPN clients","authors":"Efstratios Chatzoglou ,&nbsp;Vyron Kampourakis ,&nbsp;Zisis Tsiatsikas ,&nbsp;Georgios Karopoulos ,&nbsp;Georgios Kambourakis","doi":"10.1016/j.cose.2024.104298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the rapid growth of software services and applications, the need to secure digital assets became paramount. The introduction of Password Manager (PM) and Virtual Private Network (VPN) software was established as a prerequisite toolkit to bolster the end-user arsenal. As a matter of fact, these types of artifacts have been around for at least 25 years in various flavors, including desktop and browser-based applications. This work assesses the ability of 12 desktop PM applications, 5 browsers with integrated PM, and 12 PMs in the form of browser plugins, along with 21 VPN client applications, to effectively protect the confidentiality of secret credentials. Our analysis focuses on the period during which an app is loaded into RAM. Despite the sensitive nature of these applications, our results show that across all scenarios the majority of PM applications store plaintext passwords in the system memory; more specifically, 75% (or 9 out of 12) of desktop PM applications, 100% (5 out of 5) of browser PMs and 75% (or 9 out of 12) of PM browser plugins leak such sensitive information. In addition, 33% (or 7 out of 21) of VPN applications leak user credentials. This practice of storing cleartext sensitive information in system memory is widely recognized as a weakness, having also been registered as CWE-316. At the time of writing, merely four vendors have recognized our exploits as vulnerabilities. Three of these vendors have assigned the relevant Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) IDs, namely CVE-2023-23349, CVE-2024-9203, and CVE-2024-50570, whereas the fourth one will issue a CVE ID once it implements the relevant fixes. The remaining vendors have either chosen to disregard or downplay the severity of this issue.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51004,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Security","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 104298"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Security","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167404824006047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the rapid growth of software services and applications, the need to secure digital assets became paramount. The introduction of Password Manager (PM) and Virtual Private Network (VPN) software was established as a prerequisite toolkit to bolster the end-user arsenal. As a matter of fact, these types of artifacts have been around for at least 25 years in various flavors, including desktop and browser-based applications. This work assesses the ability of 12 desktop PM applications, 5 browsers with integrated PM, and 12 PMs in the form of browser plugins, along with 21 VPN client applications, to effectively protect the confidentiality of secret credentials. Our analysis focuses on the period during which an app is loaded into RAM. Despite the sensitive nature of these applications, our results show that across all scenarios the majority of PM applications store plaintext passwords in the system memory; more specifically, 75% (or 9 out of 12) of desktop PM applications, 100% (5 out of 5) of browser PMs and 75% (or 9 out of 12) of PM browser plugins leak such sensitive information. In addition, 33% (or 7 out of 21) of VPN applications leak user credentials. This practice of storing cleartext sensitive information in system memory is widely recognized as a weakness, having also been registered as CWE-316. At the time of writing, merely four vendors have recognized our exploits as vulnerabilities. Three of these vendors have assigned the relevant Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) IDs, namely CVE-2023-23349, CVE-2024-9203, and CVE-2024-50570, whereas the fourth one will issue a CVE ID once it implements the relevant fixes. The remaining vendors have either chosen to disregard or downplay the severity of this issue.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Security
Computers & Security 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
365
审稿时长
10.7 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Security is the most respected technical journal in the IT security field. With its high-profile editorial board and informative regular features and columns, the journal is essential reading for IT security professionals around the world. Computers & Security provides you with a unique blend of leading edge research and sound practical management advice. It is aimed at the professional involved with computer security, audit, control and data integrity in all sectors - industry, commerce and academia. Recognized worldwide as THE primary source of reference for applied research and technical expertise it is your first step to fully secure systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信