An efficient method for solving flow field in high temperature gas-cooled reactor

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Haojie Zhang, Bo Tan, Ding She, Lei Shi
{"title":"An efficient method for solving flow field in high temperature gas-cooled reactor","authors":"Haojie Zhang,&nbsp;Bo Tan,&nbsp;Ding She,&nbsp;Lei Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In thermal-hydraulic analysis of pebble-bed high temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTR), the flow field calculation is a crucial and time-consuming process. It can be treated as a mathematical problem of solving sparse linear algebraic equations, which can be solved by direct method or iterative method. By analyzing the geometric model and flow field in HTR, it is found that the flow field consists of one-dimensional (1D) and multidimensional regions. Based on the characteristics of fluid flow in pebble-bed HTR, some acceleration methods are presented in this paper, including a new matrix reordering method, symbolic factorization and block matrix solving. The main idea of matrix reordering is to arrange the 1D regions in a specific order in front of the matrix, while the other regions are placed at the back. After reordering, the fill-ins in Gauss elimination can be greatly reduced, so the direct method can be speed up. The reordered matrix is also suitable for using block matrix solvers to enhance the efficiency of matrix solving. In addition, symbolic factorization is also an efficient technique to reduce the time cost in Gauss elimination by recording the fill-ins and the elimination process. These acceleration techniques can be integrated with matrix solvers to form a variety of solving methods, which have been implemented in the DAYU3D code developed in Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology (INET) at Tsinghua University. To evaluate the efficiency of these methods, calculations have been performed on a number of typical cases of pebble-bed HTR. It was found that Gauss elimination coupled with matrix reordering and symbolic factorization techniques, has remarkable advantage compared with other solvers. In comparison to Gauss elimination, about 84%–94% reduction in fluid matrix solving time is observed in the test cases of pebble-bed HTR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20617,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 105599"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197024005493","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In thermal-hydraulic analysis of pebble-bed high temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTR), the flow field calculation is a crucial and time-consuming process. It can be treated as a mathematical problem of solving sparse linear algebraic equations, which can be solved by direct method or iterative method. By analyzing the geometric model and flow field in HTR, it is found that the flow field consists of one-dimensional (1D) and multidimensional regions. Based on the characteristics of fluid flow in pebble-bed HTR, some acceleration methods are presented in this paper, including a new matrix reordering method, symbolic factorization and block matrix solving. The main idea of matrix reordering is to arrange the 1D regions in a specific order in front of the matrix, while the other regions are placed at the back. After reordering, the fill-ins in Gauss elimination can be greatly reduced, so the direct method can be speed up. The reordered matrix is also suitable for using block matrix solvers to enhance the efficiency of matrix solving. In addition, symbolic factorization is also an efficient technique to reduce the time cost in Gauss elimination by recording the fill-ins and the elimination process. These acceleration techniques can be integrated with matrix solvers to form a variety of solving methods, which have been implemented in the DAYU3D code developed in Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology (INET) at Tsinghua University. To evaluate the efficiency of these methods, calculations have been performed on a number of typical cases of pebble-bed HTR. It was found that Gauss elimination coupled with matrix reordering and symbolic factorization techniques, has remarkable advantage compared with other solvers. In comparison to Gauss elimination, about 84%–94% reduction in fluid matrix solving time is observed in the test cases of pebble-bed HTR.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in Nuclear Energy
Progress in Nuclear Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.80%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Progress in Nuclear Energy is an international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear science and engineering. In keeping with the maturity of nuclear power, articles on safety, siting and environmental problems are encouraged, as are those associated with economics and fuel management. However, basic physics and engineering will remain an important aspect of the editorial policy. Articles published are either of a review nature or present new material in more depth. They are aimed at researchers and technically-oriented managers working in the nuclear energy field. Please note the following: 1) PNE seeks high quality research papers which are medium to long in length. Short research papers should be submitted to the journal Annals in Nuclear Energy. 2) PNE reserves the right to reject papers which are based solely on routine application of computer codes used to produce reactor designs or explain existing reactor phenomena. Such papers, although worthy, are best left as laboratory reports whereas Progress in Nuclear Energy seeks papers of originality, which are archival in nature, in the fields of mathematical and experimental nuclear technology, including fission, fusion (blanket physics, radiation damage), safety, materials aspects, economics, etc. 3) Review papers, which may occasionally be invited, are particularly sought by the journal in these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信