{"title":"A Meta-analysis of the effect of peer tutoring in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) subjects","authors":"Riyan Hidayat , Mohd Rashid Mohd Saad","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Currently, researchers have started to become interested in studying the impact of peer tutoring on academic achievement. Based on cognitive constructivism ideas. peer tutoring, founded on focuses on the significance of social interactions in learning and how they influence children's cognitive development. As such, this meta-analysis aims to look into the overall effect of peer tutoring, emphasising on STEM disciplines. The researchers utilised the PRISMA procedure to conduct a literature search across resources such as Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The process yielded 24 works with 3311 participants. The researchers calculated the effect size with standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95 % confidence interval using the R software packages. The results indicated that peer tutoring has a significant effect on academic achievement (effect size [ES] = 1.23, 95 % confidence interval [CI] [0.75, 1.70], <em>p</em> < 0.001) and other learning outcomes (effect size [ES] = 0.40, 95 % CI [0.20, 0.59], <em>p</em> < 0.001). The subgroup analysis showed revealed substantial changes in effect sizes between subjects; however, no significant differences by the type of peer tutoring were found. Thus, this suggests that studying this effect has the potential to significantly improve academic performance, specifically in STEM fields.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73445,"journal":{"name":"International journal of educational research open","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100446"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of educational research open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374025000123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Currently, researchers have started to become interested in studying the impact of peer tutoring on academic achievement. Based on cognitive constructivism ideas. peer tutoring, founded on focuses on the significance of social interactions in learning and how they influence children's cognitive development. As such, this meta-analysis aims to look into the overall effect of peer tutoring, emphasising on STEM disciplines. The researchers utilised the PRISMA procedure to conduct a literature search across resources such as Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The process yielded 24 works with 3311 participants. The researchers calculated the effect size with standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95 % confidence interval using the R software packages. The results indicated that peer tutoring has a significant effect on academic achievement (effect size [ES] = 1.23, 95 % confidence interval [CI] [0.75, 1.70], p < 0.001) and other learning outcomes (effect size [ES] = 0.40, 95 % CI [0.20, 0.59], p < 0.001). The subgroup analysis showed revealed substantial changes in effect sizes between subjects; however, no significant differences by the type of peer tutoring were found. Thus, this suggests that studying this effect has the potential to significantly improve academic performance, specifically in STEM fields.
目前,研究人员开始对研究同伴辅导对学业成绩的影响感兴趣。基于认知建构主义思想。同伴辅导,建立在关注社会互动在学习中的重要性,以及它们如何影响儿童的认知发展。因此,本荟萃分析旨在研究同伴辅导的整体效果,重点关注STEM学科。研究人员利用PRISMA程序在Web of Science、Scopus和b谷歌Scholar等资源上进行文献检索。这个过程产生了24件作品,共有3311名参与者。研究人员使用R软件包计算了标准化平均差异(SMD)和95%置信区间的效应大小。结果表明,同伴辅导对学业成绩有显著影响(效应量[ES] = 1.23, 95%置信区间[CI] [0.75, 1.70], p <;0.001)和其他学习结果(效应值[ES] = 0.40, 95% CI [0.20, 0.59], p <;0.001)。亚组分析显示受试者之间的效应量有实质性变化;然而,同伴辅导的类型没有发现显著差异。因此,这表明研究这种效应有可能显著提高学习成绩,特别是在STEM领域。