Advanced parameter extraction optimization technique for the four-diode model approach

Bhanu Prakash Saripalli , Bharati Gamgula , Revathi Ravilisetty , Prashant Kumar , Gagan Singh , Sonika Singh
{"title":"Advanced parameter extraction optimization technique for the four-diode model approach","authors":"Bhanu Prakash Saripalli ,&nbsp;Bharati Gamgula ,&nbsp;Revathi Ravilisetty ,&nbsp;Prashant Kumar ,&nbsp;Gagan Singh ,&nbsp;Sonika Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.prime.2024.100861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate performance estimation of photovoltaic devices is important in optimizing the efficiency and cost of the photovoltaic systems. The one-diode and two-diode models are used because they concisely represent the current-voltage (I-V) variations. However, these models mainly focus on the fundamental mechanism of diffusion and Shockley-Read-Hall recombination. Four-diode model (FDM) is developed from the standard three-diode model used to enhance the precision of PV system performance estimations. However, the better-detailed FDM offers modeling of other recombination and leakage currents that occur in rather complex solar cells or advanced cells like heterojunction, multijunction, or perovskite ones. This model helps to get a more accurate picture of the PV cell operation as several diodes are added to model recombination processes and defects. This work makes use of sophisticated forms of parameter extraction aimed at promoting the optimization of algorithms such as the one known as Advanced Dynamic Inertia-Particle Swarm Optimization with Velocity Clamping or ADIPSO-VC. For comparison with FDM, a three-diode model (THDM) is utilized, and the outcome of the former is then analyzed against the latter. In addition, as a confirmation of the reliability and repeatability of the results obtained by applying the developed algorithm for parameter extraction, FDM is compared with classical methods. To demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method it is tested against the other algorithms Simulated annealing, and conventional PSO. Based on the comparison, it is evident that ADIPSO-VC surpasses the other methods by demonstrating lower error rates and shorter computational time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100488,"journal":{"name":"e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100861"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772671124004406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate performance estimation of photovoltaic devices is important in optimizing the efficiency and cost of the photovoltaic systems. The one-diode and two-diode models are used because they concisely represent the current-voltage (I-V) variations. However, these models mainly focus on the fundamental mechanism of diffusion and Shockley-Read-Hall recombination. Four-diode model (FDM) is developed from the standard three-diode model used to enhance the precision of PV system performance estimations. However, the better-detailed FDM offers modeling of other recombination and leakage currents that occur in rather complex solar cells or advanced cells like heterojunction, multijunction, or perovskite ones. This model helps to get a more accurate picture of the PV cell operation as several diodes are added to model recombination processes and defects. This work makes use of sophisticated forms of parameter extraction aimed at promoting the optimization of algorithms such as the one known as Advanced Dynamic Inertia-Particle Swarm Optimization with Velocity Clamping or ADIPSO-VC. For comparison with FDM, a three-diode model (THDM) is utilized, and the outcome of the former is then analyzed against the latter. In addition, as a confirmation of the reliability and repeatability of the results obtained by applying the developed algorithm for parameter extraction, FDM is compared with classical methods. To demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method it is tested against the other algorithms Simulated annealing, and conventional PSO. Based on the comparison, it is evident that ADIPSO-VC surpasses the other methods by demonstrating lower error rates and shorter computational time.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信