Outcomes and Clinical Practices in Follow-Up of Nonmalignant Pulmonary Nodules After Bronchoscopic Biopsy

Camilo A. Avendano , Luis O. Gerena-Montano , Jason A. Beattie , Mihir S. Parikh , Kai E. Swenson , Adnan Majid , Chenchen Zhang MD, PhD
{"title":"Outcomes and Clinical Practices in Follow-Up of Nonmalignant Pulmonary Nodules After Bronchoscopic Biopsy","authors":"Camilo A. Avendano ,&nbsp;Luis O. Gerena-Montano ,&nbsp;Jason A. Beattie ,&nbsp;Mihir S. Parikh ,&nbsp;Kai E. Swenson ,&nbsp;Adnan Majid ,&nbsp;Chenchen Zhang MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.chpulm.2024.100112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Management of nonmalignant nodules after bronchoscopic biopsy lacks thorough investigation, leading to varied clinical approaches.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>What are the true-negative and false-negative rates of nonmalignant nodules by bronchoscopic biopsy, and what is the clinical practice pattern for follow-up?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review was conducted for pulmonary nodules biopsied via bronchoscopy between 2019 and 2020 revealing no malignancy. True-negative and false-negative rates were calculated. Clinical practice patterns for repeat biopsy and follow-up imaging studies were analyzed using time-to-event analysis. Covariates, including sex, age, smoking history, nodule size, maximum standardized uptake values, active cancer diagnosis, bronchoscopy type, and nodule pathologic findings, were evaluated for their impact on clinical decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 136 patients with 139 nodules analyzed, only 39.6% of nodules were classified definitively as benign (true-negative rate), whereas 23.7% of nodules were deemed malignant (false-negative rate). Repeat biopsy was performed for 35.3% of nodules, and 66.9% of patients underwent follow-up CT imaging. Nodules initially diagnosed with suspicious or atypical pathologic results reached a final diagnosis (hazard ratio, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.33-9.99) earlier than those with nondiagnostic pathologic findings. Patients with such nodules underwent repeat biopsy sooner (χ<sup>2</sup> = 15.85; <em>P</em> = .000) and exhibited a trend toward earlier repeat CT scans (χ<sup>2</sup> = 5.93; <em>P</em> = .052).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>After bronchoscopic biopsy, a 2-year follow-up revealed a notable lack of high true-negative rates for nonmalignant nodules, alongside significant false-negative rates. Diverse clinical practices, including repeat biopsy and follow-up CT scans, were observed in managing nonmalignant nodules.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94286,"journal":{"name":"CHEST pulmonary","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST pulmonary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789224000783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Management of nonmalignant nodules after bronchoscopic biopsy lacks thorough investigation, leading to varied clinical approaches.

Research Question

What are the true-negative and false-negative rates of nonmalignant nodules by bronchoscopic biopsy, and what is the clinical practice pattern for follow-up?

Study Design and Methods

A retrospective review was conducted for pulmonary nodules biopsied via bronchoscopy between 2019 and 2020 revealing no malignancy. True-negative and false-negative rates were calculated. Clinical practice patterns for repeat biopsy and follow-up imaging studies were analyzed using time-to-event analysis. Covariates, including sex, age, smoking history, nodule size, maximum standardized uptake values, active cancer diagnosis, bronchoscopy type, and nodule pathologic findings, were evaluated for their impact on clinical decision-making.

Results

Among 136 patients with 139 nodules analyzed, only 39.6% of nodules were classified definitively as benign (true-negative rate), whereas 23.7% of nodules were deemed malignant (false-negative rate). Repeat biopsy was performed for 35.3% of nodules, and 66.9% of patients underwent follow-up CT imaging. Nodules initially diagnosed with suspicious or atypical pathologic results reached a final diagnosis (hazard ratio, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.33-9.99) earlier than those with nondiagnostic pathologic findings. Patients with such nodules underwent repeat biopsy sooner (χ2 = 15.85; P = .000) and exhibited a trend toward earlier repeat CT scans (χ2 = 5.93; P = .052).

Interpretation

After bronchoscopic biopsy, a 2-year follow-up revealed a notable lack of high true-negative rates for nonmalignant nodules, alongside significant false-negative rates. Diverse clinical practices, including repeat biopsy and follow-up CT scans, were observed in managing nonmalignant nodules.
支气管镜活检后非恶性肺结节的随访结果及临床实践
背景:支气管镜活检后非恶性结节的处理缺乏彻底的调查,导致临床方法不同。研究问题:支气管镜活检非恶性结节的真阴性率和假阴性率是多少?随访的临床实践模式是什么?研究设计与方法回顾性分析2019年至2020年支气管镜活检肺结节未发现恶性肿瘤的病例。计算真阴性率和假阴性率。重复活检和随访影像学研究的临床实践模式使用时间-事件分析进行分析。协变量包括性别、年龄、吸烟史、结节大小、最大标准化摄取值、活动性癌症诊断、支气管镜检查类型和结节病理结果,评估其对临床决策的影响。结果在136例139个结节中,只有39.6%的结节被确定为良性(真阴性率),而23.7%的结节被确定为恶性(假阴性率)。35.3%的结节进行了重复活检,66.9%的患者进行了随访CT成像。最初诊断为可疑或不典型病理结果的结节最终诊断(风险比3.65;95% CI, 1.33-9.99)比有非诊断性病理表现的患者更早。此类结节患者更早接受重复活检(χ2 = 15.85;P = .000),并表现出早期重复CT扫描的趋势(χ2 = 5.93;P = .052)。支气管镜活检后,2年的随访显示,非恶性结节的真阴性率明显不足,假阴性率也明显不足。不同的临床实践,包括重复活检和随访CT扫描,观察到在管理非恶性结节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信