Identifying disparities in the relationship between neighborhood walkability and active transportation safety within South Carolina

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Anna L. Chupak , Shirelle H. Hallum , Farnaz Hesam Shariati , Erin Looney , Andrew T. Kaczynski
{"title":"Identifying disparities in the relationship between neighborhood walkability and active transportation safety within South Carolina","authors":"Anna L. Chupak ,&nbsp;Shirelle H. Hallum ,&nbsp;Farnaz Hesam Shariati ,&nbsp;Erin Looney ,&nbsp;Andrew T. Kaczynski","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Active transportation crashes are of great concern in the Southeast U.S., especially within disadvantaged neighborhoods with poor infrastructure. Little research has evaluated how characteristics of the built environment are associated with active transportation safety, or how this association may differ by neighborhood disadvantage. This study examined the relationship between neighborhood walkability and pedestrian and cyclist crashes, including variations by social vulnerability across census tracts in South Carolina (SC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Four key variables were collected for each census tract in SC (N = 1103): walkability, pedestrian and cyclist crashes, and social vulnerability. The Environmental Protection Agency's National Walkability Index (NWI) scores were averaged across block groups to determine walkability per tract. Pedestrian (N = 10,689) and cyclist (N = 4802) crash count and severity were obtained from SCDOT [2011–2021], aggregated per tract, and adjusted for average trips per day. Social vulnerability, the degree of susceptibility of a community to hazards, was measured by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Social Vulnerability Index (SVI); higher percentile rankings indicate greater SV. Hierarchical linear regressions were conducted to determine the relationship between walkability and pedestrian and cyclist crash count and severity, including moderation by SV.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across all SC census tracts, there was a significant, negative relationship between walkability and pedestrian and cyclist crash count (b = −0.005,SE = 0.001; b = −0.020,SE = 0.003) and severity (b = 1.073,SE = 0.193; b = −2.831,SE = 0.492) per trip. Further, greater walkability within tracts at high compared to low SV levels, was especially associated with fewer and less severe crashes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Worsened walkability was associated with greater and more severe active transportation crashes, significantly varying by SV. These findings help identify neighborhoods in SC in need of infrastructure improvements to address active transportation safety, thereby facilitating greater physical activity and reducing chronic disease.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101960"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524002068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Active transportation crashes are of great concern in the Southeast U.S., especially within disadvantaged neighborhoods with poor infrastructure. Little research has evaluated how characteristics of the built environment are associated with active transportation safety, or how this association may differ by neighborhood disadvantage. This study examined the relationship between neighborhood walkability and pedestrian and cyclist crashes, including variations by social vulnerability across census tracts in South Carolina (SC).

Methods

Four key variables were collected for each census tract in SC (N = 1103): walkability, pedestrian and cyclist crashes, and social vulnerability. The Environmental Protection Agency's National Walkability Index (NWI) scores were averaged across block groups to determine walkability per tract. Pedestrian (N = 10,689) and cyclist (N = 4802) crash count and severity were obtained from SCDOT [2011–2021], aggregated per tract, and adjusted for average trips per day. Social vulnerability, the degree of susceptibility of a community to hazards, was measured by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Social Vulnerability Index (SVI); higher percentile rankings indicate greater SV. Hierarchical linear regressions were conducted to determine the relationship between walkability and pedestrian and cyclist crash count and severity, including moderation by SV.

Results

Across all SC census tracts, there was a significant, negative relationship between walkability and pedestrian and cyclist crash count (b = −0.005,SE = 0.001; b = −0.020,SE = 0.003) and severity (b = 1.073,SE = 0.193; b = −2.831,SE = 0.492) per trip. Further, greater walkability within tracts at high compared to low SV levels, was especially associated with fewer and less severe crashes.

Conclusion

Worsened walkability was associated with greater and more severe active transportation crashes, significantly varying by SV. These findings help identify neighborhoods in SC in need of infrastructure improvements to address active transportation safety, thereby facilitating greater physical activity and reducing chronic disease.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信