Confusing negative commonsense knowledge generation with hierarchy modeling and LLM-enhanced filtering

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Yaqing Sheng, Weixin Zeng, Jiuyang Tang, Lihua Liu, Xiang Zhao
{"title":"Confusing negative commonsense knowledge generation with hierarchy modeling and LLM-enhanced filtering","authors":"Yaqing Sheng,&nbsp;Weixin Zeng,&nbsp;Jiuyang Tang,&nbsp;Lihua Liu,&nbsp;Xiang Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While most of the world’s knowledge exists in a positive and affirmative form, negative knowledge also plays a significant role by showing what is not true or what not to think, and has yet been largely overlooked. Existing negative commonsense knowledge generation methods adopt the generation-filtering paradigm, while the produced negative statements are easy to detect and fail to contribute to both human perception and task-specific algorithms that require negative samples for training. In response, we put forward <span>CONEG</span>, a negative commonsense knowledge generation framework that generates <em>confusing</em> statements, featuring hierarchy modeling in candidate generation and LLM-enhanced two-stage filtering. Specifically, in the <em>candidate generation</em> stage, we identify <em>congeners</em> for entity phrases in the commonsense knowledge base using box embeddings, which can effectively capture the hierarchical correlations among entity phrases and produce confusing candidates. In the <em>candidate filtering</em> stage, we design a two-stage filtering strategy, consisting of <em>intrinsic</em> triple confidence measuring and <em>extrinsic</em> refinement through large language models with group-based instructions, which can effectively filter out true facts and low-quality negative candidates. We empirically evaluate our proposal on both intrinsic assessment and downstream tasks, and the results demonstrate that <span>CONEG</span> and its components are effective in terms of producing confusing negative knowledge, surpassing the state-of-the-art methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50365,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing & Management","volume":"62 3","pages":"Article 104060"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457325000020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While most of the world’s knowledge exists in a positive and affirmative form, negative knowledge also plays a significant role by showing what is not true or what not to think, and has yet been largely overlooked. Existing negative commonsense knowledge generation methods adopt the generation-filtering paradigm, while the produced negative statements are easy to detect and fail to contribute to both human perception and task-specific algorithms that require negative samples for training. In response, we put forward CONEG, a negative commonsense knowledge generation framework that generates confusing statements, featuring hierarchy modeling in candidate generation and LLM-enhanced two-stage filtering. Specifically, in the candidate generation stage, we identify congeners for entity phrases in the commonsense knowledge base using box embeddings, which can effectively capture the hierarchical correlations among entity phrases and produce confusing candidates. In the candidate filtering stage, we design a two-stage filtering strategy, consisting of intrinsic triple confidence measuring and extrinsic refinement through large language models with group-based instructions, which can effectively filter out true facts and low-quality negative candidates. We empirically evaluate our proposal on both intrinsic assessment and downstream tasks, and the results demonstrate that CONEG and its components are effective in terms of producing confusing negative knowledge, surpassing the state-of-the-art methods.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Processing & Management
Information Processing & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
11.60%
发文量
276
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Information Processing and Management is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge original research at the convergence of computing and information science. Our scope encompasses theory, methods, and applications across various domains, including advertising, business, health, information science, information technology marketing, and social computing. We aim to cater to the interests of both primary researchers and practitioners by offering an effective platform for the timely dissemination of advanced and topical issues in this interdisciplinary field. The journal places particular emphasis on original research articles, research survey articles, research method articles, and articles addressing critical applications of research. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation at the intersection of computing and information science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信