CLAVE: A deep learning model for source code authorship verification with contrastive learning and transformer encoders

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
David Álvarez-Fidalgo , Francisco Ortin
{"title":"CLAVE: A deep learning model for source code authorship verification with contrastive learning and transformer encoders","authors":"David Álvarez-Fidalgo ,&nbsp;Francisco Ortin","doi":"10.1016/j.ipm.2024.104005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Source code authorship verification involves determining whether two code fragments are written by the same programmer. It has many uses, including malware authorship analysis, copyright dispute resolution and plagiarism detection. Source code authorship verification is challenging because it must generalize to code written by programmers not included in its training data. In this paper, we present CLAVE (Contrastive Learning for Authorship Verification with Encoder representations), a novel deep learning model for source code authorship verification that leverages contrastive learning and a Transformer Encoder-based architecture. We initially pre-train CLAVE on a dataset of 270,602 Python source code files extracted from GitHub. Subsequently, we fine-tune CLAVE for authorship verification using contrastive learning on Python submissions from 61,956 distinct programmers in Google Code Jam and Kick Start competitions. This approach allows the model to learn stylometric representations of source code, enabling comparison via vector distance for authorship verification. CLAVE achieves an AUC of 0.9782, reduces the error of the state-of-the-art source code authorship verification systems by at least 23.4% and improves the AUC of cutting-edge source code LLMs by 21.9% to 40%. We also evaluate the main components of CLAVE on its AUC performance improvement: pre-training (1.8%), loss function (0.2%–2.8%), input length (0.1%–0.7%), model size (0.2%), and tokenizer (0.1%–0.7%).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50365,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing & Management","volume":"62 3","pages":"Article 104005"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457324003649","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Source code authorship verification involves determining whether two code fragments are written by the same programmer. It has many uses, including malware authorship analysis, copyright dispute resolution and plagiarism detection. Source code authorship verification is challenging because it must generalize to code written by programmers not included in its training data. In this paper, we present CLAVE (Contrastive Learning for Authorship Verification with Encoder representations), a novel deep learning model for source code authorship verification that leverages contrastive learning and a Transformer Encoder-based architecture. We initially pre-train CLAVE on a dataset of 270,602 Python source code files extracted from GitHub. Subsequently, we fine-tune CLAVE for authorship verification using contrastive learning on Python submissions from 61,956 distinct programmers in Google Code Jam and Kick Start competitions. This approach allows the model to learn stylometric representations of source code, enabling comparison via vector distance for authorship verification. CLAVE achieves an AUC of 0.9782, reduces the error of the state-of-the-art source code authorship verification systems by at least 23.4% and improves the AUC of cutting-edge source code LLMs by 21.9% to 40%. We also evaluate the main components of CLAVE on its AUC performance improvement: pre-training (1.8%), loss function (0.2%–2.8%), input length (0.1%–0.7%), model size (0.2%), and tokenizer (0.1%–0.7%).
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Processing & Management
Information Processing & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
11.60%
发文量
276
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Information Processing and Management is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge original research at the convergence of computing and information science. Our scope encompasses theory, methods, and applications across various domains, including advertising, business, health, information science, information technology marketing, and social computing. We aim to cater to the interests of both primary researchers and practitioners by offering an effective platform for the timely dissemination of advanced and topical issues in this interdisciplinary field. The journal places particular emphasis on original research articles, research survey articles, research method articles, and articles addressing critical applications of research. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation at the intersection of computing and information science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信