The role of online platform selling mode in recycling channel selection: A game-theoretic analysis of profit and environmental impact

IF 9.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Zhaowei Miao, Hengming Peng, Yongquan Lan
{"title":"The role of online platform selling mode in recycling channel selection: A game-theoretic analysis of profit and environmental impact","authors":"Zhaowei Miao,&nbsp;Hengming Peng,&nbsp;Yongquan Lan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this paper, we develop a game theoretical model to investigate the effects of an online platform’s choice between selling modes (reselling and agency selling) on the manufacturer’s recycling channel selection when the online platform not only acts as a marketplace provider but also serves as a recycler. We find that the manufacturer should adopt agency selling (reselling) when the agency fee is low (high) and recycle used products directly from consumers under agency selling. When the agency fee is moderate, there is a Pareto improvement zone in the supply chain system. Our study also indicates that, surprisingly, as recycling cost decreases or consumers become less price-sensitive, the online platform may be induced to offer agency selling rather than reselling. The increased total profit further expands the “win-win” region, especially when compared to a scenario without remanufacturing. This implies that the induction effect becomes more pronounced, and that a Boxed Pig Game equilibrium (either the manufacturer or the online platform) may arise under agency selling. Furthermore, from an environmental impact perspective, we find that a higher return rate does not necessarily result in better environmental outcomes. Reselling always presents a conflict between economic and environmental goals, but agency selling allows for their coordination. More interestingly, it is insightful to show that the improvement of the triple bottom line outcome is achievable under agency selling when recycling costs, agency fees, and remanufacturing emissions are low as compared to reselling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":"280 ","pages":"Article 109471"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527324003281","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a game theoretical model to investigate the effects of an online platform’s choice between selling modes (reselling and agency selling) on the manufacturer’s recycling channel selection when the online platform not only acts as a marketplace provider but also serves as a recycler. We find that the manufacturer should adopt agency selling (reselling) when the agency fee is low (high) and recycle used products directly from consumers under agency selling. When the agency fee is moderate, there is a Pareto improvement zone in the supply chain system. Our study also indicates that, surprisingly, as recycling cost decreases or consumers become less price-sensitive, the online platform may be induced to offer agency selling rather than reselling. The increased total profit further expands the “win-win” region, especially when compared to a scenario without remanufacturing. This implies that the induction effect becomes more pronounced, and that a Boxed Pig Game equilibrium (either the manufacturer or the online platform) may arise under agency selling. Furthermore, from an environmental impact perspective, we find that a higher return rate does not necessarily result in better environmental outcomes. Reselling always presents a conflict between economic and environmental goals, but agency selling allows for their coordination. More interestingly, it is insightful to show that the improvement of the triple bottom line outcome is achievable under agency selling when recycling costs, agency fees, and remanufacturing emissions are low as compared to reselling.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Production Economics
International Journal of Production Economics 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
266
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信