Beyond the Bites: Rethinking seed-dispersal networks in plant-frugivore studies

IF 1.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Wesley Dáttilo
{"title":"Beyond the Bites: Rethinking seed-dispersal networks in plant-frugivore studies","authors":"Wesley Dáttilo","doi":"10.1016/j.fooweb.2024.e00384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, the use of ecological networks to understand the roles of species in plant-frugivore relationships and their evolutionary significance has increased significantly. However, the accuracy of these networks can vary based on construction methods, and there is limited discussion about the true functional roles of species. In this review, I critically evaluate the methodologies and approaches used in 65 studies to construct seed dispersal networks, with a focus on distinguishing between frugivory and effective seed dispersal. In general, I found that most of the studies built the interaction networks based on direct observations of animals eating seeds/fruits (n = 23 studies, 35.38%) and by sampling of scats (n = 18, 27.69%). Data from datasets and by using complementary methods (e.g., DNA-barcoding) accounted for 33.85% (n = 22 studies). Surprisingly, only two studies (3.08%) confirmed seed viability (i.e., if the viability of the dispersed seeds were experimentally confirmed or the microhabitat where the scat had been dropped). This highlights a critical issue: many studies fail to assess all stages of the seed dispersal process (i.e., seed consumption, transport, deposition, and germination). The potential misapplication of the term “seed-dispersal networks” could lead to significant misunderstandings about the true functionality and coevolutionary dynamics of these interactions. Consequently, I advocate for more rigorous methodologies and detailed discussions to improve accuracy about the true functional roles of species within these networks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38084,"journal":{"name":"Food Webs","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article e00384"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Webs","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352249624000508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, the use of ecological networks to understand the roles of species in plant-frugivore relationships and their evolutionary significance has increased significantly. However, the accuracy of these networks can vary based on construction methods, and there is limited discussion about the true functional roles of species. In this review, I critically evaluate the methodologies and approaches used in 65 studies to construct seed dispersal networks, with a focus on distinguishing between frugivory and effective seed dispersal. In general, I found that most of the studies built the interaction networks based on direct observations of animals eating seeds/fruits (n = 23 studies, 35.38%) and by sampling of scats (n = 18, 27.69%). Data from datasets and by using complementary methods (e.g., DNA-barcoding) accounted for 33.85% (n = 22 studies). Surprisingly, only two studies (3.08%) confirmed seed viability (i.e., if the viability of the dispersed seeds were experimentally confirmed or the microhabitat where the scat had been dropped). This highlights a critical issue: many studies fail to assess all stages of the seed dispersal process (i.e., seed consumption, transport, deposition, and germination). The potential misapplication of the term “seed-dispersal networks” could lead to significant misunderstandings about the true functionality and coevolutionary dynamics of these interactions. Consequently, I advocate for more rigorous methodologies and detailed discussions to improve accuracy about the true functional roles of species within these networks.
超越叮咬:重新思考植物果实研究中的种子传播网络
近年来,利用生态网络来了解物种在植物-食子动物关系中的作用及其进化意义已显著增加。然而,这些网络的准确性可能因构建方法而异,而且关于物种真正功能角色的讨论有限。在这篇综述中,我批判性地评价了65项研究中用于构建种子传播网络的方法和方法,重点是区分果实和有效的种子传播。总的来说,我发现大多数研究都是基于直接观察动物吃种子/水果(n = 23, 35.38%)和粪便抽样(n = 18, 27.69%)来构建交互网络的。来自数据集和互补方法(如dna条形码)的数据占33.85% (n = 22项研究)。令人惊讶的是,只有两项研究(3.08%)证实了种子的活力(即,如果实验证实了分散种子的活力或粪便被丢弃的微栖息地)。这突出了一个关键问题:许多研究未能评估种子传播过程的所有阶段(即种子消耗、运输、沉积和萌发)。对“种子传播网络”这一术语的潜在误用可能导致对这些相互作用的真正功能和共同进化动力学的重大误解。因此,我主张采用更严格的方法和详细的讨论,以提高物种在这些网络中真正功能角色的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Webs
Food Webs Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信