Distinct mantle sources of two types of Neoproterozoic diabase in the North China Craton: Implications for mantle plume activity and ancient continent reconstruction

IF 3.2 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Qi Hou , Xiao-Ying Gao , Xiao-Yong Yang , Jun Tang , Shao-Bing Zhang , Zhang-Ping Liu , Cai-Yu Wan
{"title":"Distinct mantle sources of two types of Neoproterozoic diabase in the North China Craton: Implications for mantle plume activity and ancient continent reconstruction","authors":"Qi Hou ,&nbsp;Xiao-Ying Gao ,&nbsp;Xiao-Yong Yang ,&nbsp;Jun Tang ,&nbsp;Shao-Bing Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhang-Ping Liu ,&nbsp;Cai-Yu Wan","doi":"10.1016/j.precamres.2024.107662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Large igneous provinces (LIPs) are often used as powerful tools for constraining continental reconstructions. The configuration of the North China Craton (NCC) in the Rodinia supercontinent remains a subject of controversy due to limited reliable records of Neoproterozoic magmatism. In this study, two types of Neoproterozoic mafic magmatic rocks, known as the Langan diabase (∼913 Ma), have been identified in the southeastern margin of the NCC: (1) Group Ⅰ that exhibits low La/Yb ratios (3.8–6.4), ∑REE contents (51–74 ppm), ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t) (-6.9 – -0.3), ε<sub>Hf</sub>(t) (1.98–6.26) and relatively high <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr<sub>(i)</sub> (0.705047 to 0.706353), Mg<sup>#</sup> (58–63) and δ<sup>18</sup>O values (6.65–7.82‰); (2) Group Ⅱ-1 that has high ∑REE contents (214–222 ppm), ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t) (2.3–4.1), ε<sub>Hf</sub>(t) (5.03–10.70), and low <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr<sub>(i)</sub> (0.704479–0.704829), Mg<sup>#</sup> (~33), La/Yb ratios (6.1–6.3) and δ<sup>18</sup>O values (6.36–7.20‰). Meanwhile, Group Ⅱ-2 mafic rocks can be identified in previous studies that differ from the Group Ⅱ-1 samples in having much higher La/Yb ratios (8.0–19.0). The geochemical differences between Group Ⅰ and Group Ⅱ mafic rocks indicate that they might have originated from distinct mantle sources under varying melting conditions and undergone different differentiation and contamination processes. In the shallow magma chamber, Group Ⅰ samples underwent a process of fractionation involving olivine and clinopyroxene, whereas Group Ⅱ samples exhibited fractional crystallization encompassing olivine, clinopyroxene, plagioclase, and rutile. According to REE inversion calculations, the primary magma of Group Ⅰ samples were derived from the high degrees of partial melting (5–20 %) of a spinel-dominant peridotite mantle source, and the Sr-Nd-O-Hf isotope composition indicates that there are approximately 30 % continental lithospheric mantle components in their mantle source. In contrast, the Group Ⅱ-1 diabase’ parental magmas were generated by 5–20 % partial melting of a garnet-bearing pyroxenite mantle source, while the Group Ⅱ-2 samples were derived from low degrees of partial melting (3–10 %) of a garnet-dominant pyroxenite mantle. All Group Ⅱ sample mantle sources contain approximately 20 % lithospheric components.</div><div>Combining all Neoproterozoic mafic samples in the São Francisco Craton and the Congo Craton, this research pointed out that these rocks might have resulted from a mantle plume. In detail, at the beginning of mantle plume activity, the primary magma of Group Ⅱ-1 sample was derived from the mixing between the mantle plume margin and a small amount of overlying lithospheric mantle in the spinel-garnet transition zone. Shortly thereafter, in a brief span of time, the subsequent upwelling of high-temperature magma assimilated more lithospheric components in the plume’s axial area, producing the Group Ⅰ samples’ primary magma in the spinel stability field. Within the periphery of the mantle plume, the thicker lithospheric mantle confines melting activities to occur only in the garnet stability field, resulting in a relatively low degree of melting and producing the primary magma of Group Ⅱ-2 samples. Finally, based on the spatial chemical variation of all Neoproterozoic mafic magmas, a new model for reconstructing ancient continents has been proposed, which illustrated the NCC was adjacent to both the São Francisco and the Congo Craton, and the Xuhuai Basin, Pedro Lessa diabase, Espinhaço mafic rocks and Gangila meta-basalts could represent the mantle plume’s central position.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49674,"journal":{"name":"Precambrian Research","volume":"417 ","pages":"Article 107662"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precambrian Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301926824003759","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large igneous provinces (LIPs) are often used as powerful tools for constraining continental reconstructions. The configuration of the North China Craton (NCC) in the Rodinia supercontinent remains a subject of controversy due to limited reliable records of Neoproterozoic magmatism. In this study, two types of Neoproterozoic mafic magmatic rocks, known as the Langan diabase (∼913 Ma), have been identified in the southeastern margin of the NCC: (1) Group Ⅰ that exhibits low La/Yb ratios (3.8–6.4), ∑REE contents (51–74 ppm), εNd(t) (-6.9 – -0.3), εHf(t) (1.98–6.26) and relatively high 87Sr/86Sr(i) (0.705047 to 0.706353), Mg# (58–63) and δ18O values (6.65–7.82‰); (2) Group Ⅱ-1 that has high ∑REE contents (214–222 ppm), εNd(t) (2.3–4.1), εHf(t) (5.03–10.70), and low 87Sr/86Sr(i) (0.704479–0.704829), Mg# (~33), La/Yb ratios (6.1–6.3) and δ18O values (6.36–7.20‰). Meanwhile, Group Ⅱ-2 mafic rocks can be identified in previous studies that differ from the Group Ⅱ-1 samples in having much higher La/Yb ratios (8.0–19.0). The geochemical differences between Group Ⅰ and Group Ⅱ mafic rocks indicate that they might have originated from distinct mantle sources under varying melting conditions and undergone different differentiation and contamination processes. In the shallow magma chamber, Group Ⅰ samples underwent a process of fractionation involving olivine and clinopyroxene, whereas Group Ⅱ samples exhibited fractional crystallization encompassing olivine, clinopyroxene, plagioclase, and rutile. According to REE inversion calculations, the primary magma of Group Ⅰ samples were derived from the high degrees of partial melting (5–20 %) of a spinel-dominant peridotite mantle source, and the Sr-Nd-O-Hf isotope composition indicates that there are approximately 30 % continental lithospheric mantle components in their mantle source. In contrast, the Group Ⅱ-1 diabase’ parental magmas were generated by 5–20 % partial melting of a garnet-bearing pyroxenite mantle source, while the Group Ⅱ-2 samples were derived from low degrees of partial melting (3–10 %) of a garnet-dominant pyroxenite mantle. All Group Ⅱ sample mantle sources contain approximately 20 % lithospheric components.
Combining all Neoproterozoic mafic samples in the São Francisco Craton and the Congo Craton, this research pointed out that these rocks might have resulted from a mantle plume. In detail, at the beginning of mantle plume activity, the primary magma of Group Ⅱ-1 sample was derived from the mixing between the mantle plume margin and a small amount of overlying lithospheric mantle in the spinel-garnet transition zone. Shortly thereafter, in a brief span of time, the subsequent upwelling of high-temperature magma assimilated more lithospheric components in the plume’s axial area, producing the Group Ⅰ samples’ primary magma in the spinel stability field. Within the periphery of the mantle plume, the thicker lithospheric mantle confines melting activities to occur only in the garnet stability field, resulting in a relatively low degree of melting and producing the primary magma of Group Ⅱ-2 samples. Finally, based on the spatial chemical variation of all Neoproterozoic mafic magmas, a new model for reconstructing ancient continents has been proposed, which illustrated the NCC was adjacent to both the São Francisco and the Congo Craton, and the Xuhuai Basin, Pedro Lessa diabase, Espinhaço mafic rocks and Gangila meta-basalts could represent the mantle plume’s central position.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Precambrian Research
Precambrian Research 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
28.90%
发文量
325
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Precambrian Research publishes studies on all aspects of the early stages of the composition, structure and evolution of the Earth and its planetary neighbours. With a focus on process-oriented and comparative studies, it covers, but is not restricted to, subjects such as: (1) Chemical, biological, biochemical and cosmochemical evolution; the origin of life; the evolution of the oceans and atmosphere; the early fossil record; palaeobiology; (2) Geochronology and isotope and elemental geochemistry; (3) Precambrian mineral deposits; (4) Geophysical aspects of the early Earth and Precambrian terrains; (5) Nature, formation and evolution of the Precambrian lithosphere and mantle including magmatic, depositional, metamorphic and tectonic processes. In addition, the editors particularly welcome integrated process-oriented studies that involve a combination of the above fields and comparative studies that demonstrate the effect of Precambrian evolution on Phanerozoic earth system processes. Regional and localised studies of Precambrian phenomena are considered appropriate only when the detail and quality allow illustration of a wider process, or when significant gaps in basic knowledge of a particular area can be filled.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信