Detecting and measuring fine-scale urban tree canopy loss with deep learning and remote sensing

David Pedley, Justin Morgenroth
{"title":"Detecting and measuring fine-scale urban tree canopy loss with deep learning and remote sensing","authors":"David Pedley,&nbsp;Justin Morgenroth","doi":"10.1016/j.ophoto.2025.100082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban trees provide a multitude of environmental and amenity benefits for city occupants yet face ongoing risk of removal due to urban pressures and the preferences of landowners. Understanding the extent and location of canopy loss is critical for the effective management of urban forests. Although city-scale assessments of urban forest canopy cover are common, the accurate identification of fine-scale canopy loss remains challenging. Evaluating change at the property scale is of particular importance given the localised benefits of urban trees and the scale at which tree removal decisions are made.</div><div>The objective of this study was to develop a method to accurately detect and quantify the city-wide loss of urban tree canopy (UTC) at the scale of individual properties using publicly available remote sensing data. The study area was the city of Christchurch, New Zealand, with the study focussed on UTC loss that occurred between 2016 and 2021. To accurately delineate the 2016 UTC, a semantic segmentation deep learning model (DeepLabv3+) was pretrained using existing UTC data and fine-tuned using high resolution aerial imagery. The output of this model was then segmented into polygons representing individual trees using the Segment Anything Model. To overcome poor alignment of aerial imagery, LiDAR point cloud data was utilised to identify changes in height between 2016 and 2021, which was overlaid across the 2016 UTC to map areas of UTC loss. The accuracy of UTC loss predictions was validated using a visual comparison of aerial imagery and LiDAR data, with UTC loss quantified for each property within the study area.</div><div>The loss detection method achieved accurate results for the property-scale identification of UTC loss, including a mean F1 score of 0.934 and a mean IOU of 0.883. Precision values were higher than recall values (0.941 compared to 0.811), which reflected a deliberately conservative approach to avoid false positive detections. Approximately 14.5% of 2016 UTC was lost by 2021, with 74.9% of the UTC loss occurring on residential land. This research provides a novel geospatial method for evaluating fine-scale city-wide tree dynamics using remote sensing data of varying type and quality with imperfect alignment. This creates the opportunity for detailed evaluation of the drivers of UTC loss on individual properties to enable better management of existing urban forests.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100730,"journal":{"name":"ISPRS Open Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100082"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISPRS Open Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667393225000018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban trees provide a multitude of environmental and amenity benefits for city occupants yet face ongoing risk of removal due to urban pressures and the preferences of landowners. Understanding the extent and location of canopy loss is critical for the effective management of urban forests. Although city-scale assessments of urban forest canopy cover are common, the accurate identification of fine-scale canopy loss remains challenging. Evaluating change at the property scale is of particular importance given the localised benefits of urban trees and the scale at which tree removal decisions are made.
The objective of this study was to develop a method to accurately detect and quantify the city-wide loss of urban tree canopy (UTC) at the scale of individual properties using publicly available remote sensing data. The study area was the city of Christchurch, New Zealand, with the study focussed on UTC loss that occurred between 2016 and 2021. To accurately delineate the 2016 UTC, a semantic segmentation deep learning model (DeepLabv3+) was pretrained using existing UTC data and fine-tuned using high resolution aerial imagery. The output of this model was then segmented into polygons representing individual trees using the Segment Anything Model. To overcome poor alignment of aerial imagery, LiDAR point cloud data was utilised to identify changes in height between 2016 and 2021, which was overlaid across the 2016 UTC to map areas of UTC loss. The accuracy of UTC loss predictions was validated using a visual comparison of aerial imagery and LiDAR data, with UTC loss quantified for each property within the study area.
The loss detection method achieved accurate results for the property-scale identification of UTC loss, including a mean F1 score of 0.934 and a mean IOU of 0.883. Precision values were higher than recall values (0.941 compared to 0.811), which reflected a deliberately conservative approach to avoid false positive detections. Approximately 14.5% of 2016 UTC was lost by 2021, with 74.9% of the UTC loss occurring on residential land. This research provides a novel geospatial method for evaluating fine-scale city-wide tree dynamics using remote sensing data of varying type and quality with imperfect alignment. This creates the opportunity for detailed evaluation of the drivers of UTC loss on individual properties to enable better management of existing urban forests.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信