Beneficios de un modelo asistencial integral en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca y enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica: programa UMIPIC

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
M. Méndez Bailón , Á. González-Franco , J.M. Cerqueiro , J. Pérez-Silvestre , C. Moreno García , A. Conde-Martel , J.C. Arévalo-Lorido , F. Formiga Pérez , L. Manzano-Espinosa , M. Montero-Pérez-Barquero
{"title":"Beneficios de un modelo asistencial integral en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca y enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica: programa UMIPIC","authors":"M. Méndez Bailón ,&nbsp;Á. González-Franco ,&nbsp;J.M. Cerqueiro ,&nbsp;J. Pérez-Silvestre ,&nbsp;C. Moreno García ,&nbsp;A. Conde-Martel ,&nbsp;J.C. Arévalo-Lorido ,&nbsp;F. Formiga Pérez ,&nbsp;L. Manzano-Espinosa ,&nbsp;M. Montero-Pérez-Barquero","doi":"10.1016/j.rce.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with heart failure (HF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have a high risk of hospital admission and mortality. This study evaluated the benefit of a care model, characterized by comprehensive and continuous care (UMIPIC program) in patients with HF and a history of COPD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 5644 patients were prospectively recruited, of which 1320 had a history of COPD between March 2008 and March 2020. They were divided into two follow-up groups at the time of discharge, one in follow-up in the UMIPIC program (435 patients) and another treated conventionally (885 patients). The baseline characteristics of each group were analyzed and patients in each group were selected by propensity score matching and admissions and mortality were evaluated during 12 months of follow-up, after an episode of hospitalization for HF.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The UMIPIC group, compared to the conventional group in the matched cohort, had a lower rate of admissions for HF (21 vs. 30%, respectively; hazard ratio<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.64; 95% CI: 0.54–0.84; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002) and mortality (28 vs. 36%, respectively; hazard ratio<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.68; 95% CI: 0.51–0.90; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.008). From a therapeutic point of view, patients with HF and a history of COPD who were followed in the UMIPIC program received a higher percentage of beta-blockers (63.9 vs. 54.2%; <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) and direct-acting anticoagulants (17 vs. 9%; <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) than those followed conventionally.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The implementation of the UMIPIC care program for patients with HF and a history of COPD, based on comprehensive and continuous care, reduces both admissions and mortality at one year of follow-up. The prescription of beta-blockers and direct-acting anticoagulants was also higher during follow-up in the UMIPIC program.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21223,"journal":{"name":"Revista clinica espanola","volume":"225 1","pages":"Pages 1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista clinica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014256524001723","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients with heart failure (HF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have a high risk of hospital admission and mortality. This study evaluated the benefit of a care model, characterized by comprehensive and continuous care (UMIPIC program) in patients with HF and a history of COPD.

Methods

A total of 5644 patients were prospectively recruited, of which 1320 had a history of COPD between March 2008 and March 2020. They were divided into two follow-up groups at the time of discharge, one in follow-up in the UMIPIC program (435 patients) and another treated conventionally (885 patients). The baseline characteristics of each group were analyzed and patients in each group were selected by propensity score matching and admissions and mortality were evaluated during 12 months of follow-up, after an episode of hospitalization for HF.

Results

The UMIPIC group, compared to the conventional group in the matched cohort, had a lower rate of admissions for HF (21 vs. 30%, respectively; hazard ratio = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.54–0.84; p = 0.002) and mortality (28 vs. 36%, respectively; hazard ratio = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.51–0.90; p = 0.008). From a therapeutic point of view, patients with HF and a history of COPD who were followed in the UMIPIC program received a higher percentage of beta-blockers (63.9 vs. 54.2%; p < 0.05) and direct-acting anticoagulants (17 vs. 9%; p < 0.05) than those followed conventionally.

Conclusions

The implementation of the UMIPIC care program for patients with HF and a history of COPD, based on comprehensive and continuous care, reduces both admissions and mortality at one year of follow-up. The prescription of beta-blockers and direct-acting anticoagulants was also higher during follow-up in the UMIPIC program.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista clinica espanola
Revista clinica espanola 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
73
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Revista Clínica Española published its first issue in 1940 and is the body of expression of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI). The journal fully endorses the goals of updating knowledge and facilitating the acquisition of key developments in internal medicine applied to clinical practice. Revista Clínica Española is subject to a thorough double blind review of the received articles written in Spanish or English. Nine issues are published each year, including mostly originals, reviews and consensus documents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信