An integrated design concept evaluation method based on fuzzy weighted zero inconsistency and combined compromise solution considering inherent uncertainties

IF 8 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Liming Xiao , Tao Fang , Guangquan Huang , Muhammet Deveci
{"title":"An integrated design concept evaluation method based on fuzzy weighted zero inconsistency and combined compromise solution considering inherent uncertainties","authors":"Liming Xiao ,&nbsp;Tao Fang ,&nbsp;Guangquan Huang ,&nbsp;Muhammet Deveci","doi":"10.1016/j.aei.2024.103097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Design concept evaluation (DCE) is crucial at the new product development stage, and effective evaluation can validate the feasibility of the new product and reduce project risks. Many valuable DCE methods have been introduced to identify the optimal one among several design concepts. However, previous methods have some drawbacks, such as the manipulation of multiple uncertainties, the determination of weights, and the identification of the best concept. To solve these problems, this paper develops a novel DCE model based on <em>q</em>-rung orthopair fuzzy rough (<em>q</em>-ROFR) sets, which employs the fuzzy-weighted zero inconsistency (FWZIC) and combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) methods. First, an evaluation environment for <em>q</em>-ROFR sets is provided by integrating the advantages of <em>q</em>-rung orthopair fuzzy sets and rough approximations, and some novel <em>q</em>-ROFR Einstein aggregation operators are introduced to aggregate the information to handle uncertainties more effectively. On this basis, the FWZIC method is adopted to determine the weights of criteria more reliably, and the CoCoSo method is utilized to evaluate the performance of the alternatives to determine the optimal solution more accurately and flexibly. Finally, a case study regarding the DCE of horizontal machining centers, sensitivity analysis, and comparisons are presented to validate the superiority of the proposed model. Results show that the proposed method is effective and can identify the best concepts more reliably.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50941,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Engineering Informatics","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 103097"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Engineering Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474034624007481","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Design concept evaluation (DCE) is crucial at the new product development stage, and effective evaluation can validate the feasibility of the new product and reduce project risks. Many valuable DCE methods have been introduced to identify the optimal one among several design concepts. However, previous methods have some drawbacks, such as the manipulation of multiple uncertainties, the determination of weights, and the identification of the best concept. To solve these problems, this paper develops a novel DCE model based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy rough (q-ROFR) sets, which employs the fuzzy-weighted zero inconsistency (FWZIC) and combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) methods. First, an evaluation environment for q-ROFR sets is provided by integrating the advantages of q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets and rough approximations, and some novel q-ROFR Einstein aggregation operators are introduced to aggregate the information to handle uncertainties more effectively. On this basis, the FWZIC method is adopted to determine the weights of criteria more reliably, and the CoCoSo method is utilized to evaluate the performance of the alternatives to determine the optimal solution more accurately and flexibly. Finally, a case study regarding the DCE of horizontal machining centers, sensitivity analysis, and comparisons are presented to validate the superiority of the proposed model. Results show that the proposed method is effective and can identify the best concepts more reliably.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advanced Engineering Informatics
Advanced Engineering Informatics 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
292
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Advanced Engineering Informatics is an international Journal that solicits research papers with an emphasis on 'knowledge' and 'engineering applications'. The Journal seeks original papers that report progress in applying methods of engineering informatics. These papers should have engineering relevance and help provide a scientific base for more reliable, spontaneous, and creative engineering decision-making. Additionally, papers should demonstrate the science of supporting knowledge-intensive engineering tasks and validate the generality, power, and scalability of new methods through rigorous evaluation, preferably both qualitatively and quantitatively. Abstracting and indexing for Advanced Engineering Informatics include Science Citation Index Expanded, Scopus and INSPEC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信