An integrated multi-stage decision model for upstream supply chain disaster management readiness assessment

Detcharat Sumrit, Orawan Jongprasittiphol
{"title":"An integrated multi-stage decision model for upstream supply chain disaster management readiness assessment","authors":"Detcharat Sumrit,&nbsp;Orawan Jongprasittiphol","doi":"10.1016/j.dajour.2024.100538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Supply Chain Disaster Management (SCDM) is essential for mitigating disruptions, ensuring business continuity, and maintaining a competitive advantage. This study introduces a comprehensive decision model to assess disaster management readiness within the upstream supply chain. Through an extensive literature review grounded in Contingency Resource-Based View (CRBV) theory, fifteen initial readiness factors (<em>RFs</em>) are identified. The Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) then refines these factors to twelve, enhancing their relevance and applicability. Next, the Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relation (FLinPreRa) method assesses the relative importance of each <em>RF</em>, providing a profound understanding of their individual and collective impact. Finally, Weight-Variance Analysis (WVA) evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of each <em>RF</em>, enabling targeted strategies for enhancing disaster readiness. A case study involving five automotive manufacturers in Thailand showcases the practical application of this decision model. The results indicate that this approach is an effective tool for assessing SCDM readiness, pinpointing critical areas for improvement, and guiding strategic investment. Beyond enhancing disaster preparedness, the model also strengthens overall supply chain resilience and responsiveness. Moreover, the framework can be easily adapted to other industries aiming to improve their SCDM readiness by tailoring it to address sector-specific challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100357,"journal":{"name":"Decision Analytics Journal","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100538"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Analytics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772662224001425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Supply Chain Disaster Management (SCDM) is essential for mitigating disruptions, ensuring business continuity, and maintaining a competitive advantage. This study introduces a comprehensive decision model to assess disaster management readiness within the upstream supply chain. Through an extensive literature review grounded in Contingency Resource-Based View (CRBV) theory, fifteen initial readiness factors (RFs) are identified. The Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) then refines these factors to twelve, enhancing their relevance and applicability. Next, the Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relation (FLinPreRa) method assesses the relative importance of each RF, providing a profound understanding of their individual and collective impact. Finally, Weight-Variance Analysis (WVA) evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of each RF, enabling targeted strategies for enhancing disaster readiness. A case study involving five automotive manufacturers in Thailand showcases the practical application of this decision model. The results indicate that this approach is an effective tool for assessing SCDM readiness, pinpointing critical areas for improvement, and guiding strategic investment. Beyond enhancing disaster preparedness, the model also strengthens overall supply chain resilience and responsiveness. Moreover, the framework can be easily adapted to other industries aiming to improve their SCDM readiness by tailoring it to address sector-specific challenges.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信