An efficiency score unification method in data envelopment analysis using slack-based models with application in banking

Ali Hadi , Alireza Amirteimoori , Sohrab Kordrostami , Saeid Mehrabian
{"title":"An efficiency score unification method in data envelopment analysis using slack-based models with application in banking","authors":"Ali Hadi ,&nbsp;Alireza Amirteimoori ,&nbsp;Sohrab Kordrostami ,&nbsp;Saeid Mehrabian","doi":"10.1016/j.dajour.2024.100541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Providing a unique estimation model of the efficiency score for a bank branch has long been a primary concern for bank managers, who frequently reject efficiency studies because they contend that a single perspective evaluation cannot adequately display the multifunctional nature of decision-making units (DMUs). This paper presents a unification model for efficiency scores in the banking industry. The proposed model evaluates the efficiency of decision-making units through a two-stage method from different perspectives. This study calculates efficiency scores from several aspects and various inputs/outputs in the first stage, so an expanded space is used in the second stage. All viewpoints are transferred into a new space, creating a new efficient frontier in the expanded space. This model presents the unified efficiency score from DMUs by applying the slack-based model (SBM), which proposes enhancement guidelines. A unified efficiency score is created by considering three perspectives: production, profitability, and intermediary. Unlike the average score, the results show that the unified efficiency score can reflect the performance difference between the three scores achieved from the three perspectives. Additionally, this method demonstrates that DMUs cannot achieve overall efficiency if they are inefficient in at least one of the three aspects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100357,"journal":{"name":"Decision Analytics Journal","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100541"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Analytics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772662224001450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Providing a unique estimation model of the efficiency score for a bank branch has long been a primary concern for bank managers, who frequently reject efficiency studies because they contend that a single perspective evaluation cannot adequately display the multifunctional nature of decision-making units (DMUs). This paper presents a unification model for efficiency scores in the banking industry. The proposed model evaluates the efficiency of decision-making units through a two-stage method from different perspectives. This study calculates efficiency scores from several aspects and various inputs/outputs in the first stage, so an expanded space is used in the second stage. All viewpoints are transferred into a new space, creating a new efficient frontier in the expanded space. This model presents the unified efficiency score from DMUs by applying the slack-based model (SBM), which proposes enhancement guidelines. A unified efficiency score is created by considering three perspectives: production, profitability, and intermediary. Unlike the average score, the results show that the unified efficiency score can reflect the performance difference between the three scores achieved from the three perspectives. Additionally, this method demonstrates that DMUs cannot achieve overall efficiency if they are inefficient in at least one of the three aspects.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信