{"title":"Impacto pronóstico del Log Odds de ganglios linfáticos positivos (LODDS) en la estratificación de pacientes con cáncer de recto","authors":"Vincenzo Vigorita , Oscar Cano-Valderrama , Raquel Sánchez-Santos , Marta Paniagua-Garcia-Señorans , Enrique Moncada , Gianluca Pellino , Jesús Paredes-Cotoré , Enrique Casal","doi":"10.1016/j.ciresp.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The use of the N category of the TNM staging system, lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in predicting overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with rectal cancer is still controversial.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>A retrospective study of 445 patients with rectal cancer who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2017 in the University Complex Hospital of Vigo was performed. Patients were stratified according to number of lymph nodes examined (NLNE), N staging, LNR and LODDS. The analysis was performed using the log-rank test, Kaplan-Meier functions, Cox regression and ROC curves.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five-year OS and DFS were 73.7% and 62.5%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed depending on NLNE. Increased LNR and LODDS were associated with shorter OS and DFS, independently of NLNE.</div><div>Multivariate analysis showed that N stage, LNR and LODDS were independently associated with OS and DFS; however, the LODDS system obtained the best area under the curve, with greater predictive capacity for OS (AUC: 0.679) and DFS (AUC: 0.711).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>LODDS and LNR give prognostic information that is not related to NLNE. LODDS provides better prognostic accuracy in patients with negative nodes than LNR and N stage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50690,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Espanola","volume":"102 12","pages":"Pages 649-657"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Espanola","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009739X24002215","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The use of the N category of the TNM staging system, lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in predicting overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with rectal cancer is still controversial.
Material and methods
A retrospective study of 445 patients with rectal cancer who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2017 in the University Complex Hospital of Vigo was performed. Patients were stratified according to number of lymph nodes examined (NLNE), N staging, LNR and LODDS. The analysis was performed using the log-rank test, Kaplan-Meier functions, Cox regression and ROC curves.
Results
Five-year OS and DFS were 73.7% and 62.5%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed depending on NLNE. Increased LNR and LODDS were associated with shorter OS and DFS, independently of NLNE.
Multivariate analysis showed that N stage, LNR and LODDS were independently associated with OS and DFS; however, the LODDS system obtained the best area under the curve, with greater predictive capacity for OS (AUC: 0.679) and DFS (AUC: 0.711).
Conclusion
LODDS and LNR give prognostic information that is not related to NLNE. LODDS provides better prognostic accuracy in patients with negative nodes than LNR and N stage.
期刊介绍:
Cirugía Española, an official body of the Asociación Española de Cirujanos (Spanish Association of Surgeons), will consider original articles, reviews, editorials, special articles, scientific letters, letters to the editor, and medical images for publication; all of these will be submitted to an anonymous external peer review process. There is also the possibility of accepting book reviews of recent publications related to General and Digestive Surgery.