Tamara Fernández-Miguel , Óscar Cano-Valderrama , Marta Paniagua García-Señorans , Alba Correa Bonito , Emilio Peña Ros , María Luisa Reyes-Díaz , Carlos Cerdán-Santacruz , Grupo Joven de la Asociación Española de Coloproctología (GJ-AECP): Grupo de trabajo sobre formación especializada
{"title":"Formación específica en coloproctología: estudio de cohortes transversal a través del Grupo Joven de la Asociación Española de Coloproctología","authors":"Tamara Fernández-Miguel , Óscar Cano-Valderrama , Marta Paniagua García-Señorans , Alba Correa Bonito , Emilio Peña Ros , María Luisa Reyes-Díaz , Carlos Cerdán-Santacruz , Grupo Joven de la Asociación Española de Coloproctología (GJ-AECP): Grupo de trabajo sobre formación especializada","doi":"10.1016/j.ciresp.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Specific training at surgical super-specialities and its objective evaluation is a challenge nowadays in order to measure the potential benefits that it might add.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>An online survey addressed by the <em>Grupo Joven de la Asociación Española de Coloproctología</em> has been performed in order to evaluate the level of formation achieved specifically at colorectal surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred twenty-eight surgeons participated, representing 81 colorectal surgery units. Mean satisfaction after the period of formation was moderate to high in 84% of the ones polled. The main points of improvement were the realization of advanced surgical techniques (52%) and academic questions (45%). The big part of the respondents has performed simple proctologic procedures (98%) and oncological open colic resections (100%) during their training period, observing the scarcity of related pelvic floor procedures (20%) and diagnosis techniques (10-45%). Scientific production (31.5%) and presentation of studies at congresses (82.8%) have been moderated. No differences between accredited units and non-accredited units have been observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Specific formation in colorectal surgery is appropriate, with a high level of simple procedures and open surgery performed by personal at formation. In view of these results, it seems logical to think that even though is necessary a progress in the formation of minimal invasive and diagnosis techniques.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50690,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Espanola","volume":"102 12","pages":"Pages 658-666"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Espanola","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009739X24002252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Specific training at surgical super-specialities and its objective evaluation is a challenge nowadays in order to measure the potential benefits that it might add.
Material and methods
An online survey addressed by the Grupo Joven de la Asociación Española de Coloproctología has been performed in order to evaluate the level of formation achieved specifically at colorectal surgery.
Results
One hundred twenty-eight surgeons participated, representing 81 colorectal surgery units. Mean satisfaction after the period of formation was moderate to high in 84% of the ones polled. The main points of improvement were the realization of advanced surgical techniques (52%) and academic questions (45%). The big part of the respondents has performed simple proctologic procedures (98%) and oncological open colic resections (100%) during their training period, observing the scarcity of related pelvic floor procedures (20%) and diagnosis techniques (10-45%). Scientific production (31.5%) and presentation of studies at congresses (82.8%) have been moderated. No differences between accredited units and non-accredited units have been observed.
Conclusions
Specific formation in colorectal surgery is appropriate, with a high level of simple procedures and open surgery performed by personal at formation. In view of these results, it seems logical to think that even though is necessary a progress in the formation of minimal invasive and diagnosis techniques.
为了衡量其可能增加的潜在好处,外科超级专业的特定培训及其客观评估是当今的一项挑战。材料和方法由Joven de la Asociación Española de Coloproctología小组进行的一项在线调查已进行,以评估结直肠手术中具体实现的形成水平。结果来自81个结直肠外科单位的128名外科医生参与了调查。在84%的被调查者中,形成期后的平均满意度为中等到较高。改善的主要点是实现先进的手术技术(52%)和学术问题(45%)。大部分受访者在培训期间进行了简单的直肠外科手术(98%)和肿瘤开放性结肠切除术(100%),观察到相关盆底手术(20%)和诊断技术(10-45%)的缺乏。科学成果(31.5%)和在大会上的研究报告(82.8%)得到了缓和。认可单位与非认可单位之间并无差异。结论在结直肠手术中采用特异性成形术是合适的,可采用高水平的简易手术和个人成形术进行开放性手术。鉴于这些结果,认为微创和诊断技术的形成仍有必要取得进展似乎是合乎逻辑的。
期刊介绍:
Cirugía Española, an official body of the Asociación Española de Cirujanos (Spanish Association of Surgeons), will consider original articles, reviews, editorials, special articles, scientific letters, letters to the editor, and medical images for publication; all of these will be submitted to an anonymous external peer review process. There is also the possibility of accepting book reviews of recent publications related to General and Digestive Surgery.