The development of the Postdoctoral Nurses Competence Scale: A Delphi consensus and content validity study

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Annika Sterkenburg MSc , Lisa J.C. van Dongen MSc , Thóra B. Hafsteinsdóttir PhD
{"title":"The development of the Postdoctoral Nurses Competence Scale: A Delphi consensus and content validity study","authors":"Annika Sterkenburg MSc ,&nbsp;Lisa J.C. van Dongen MSc ,&nbsp;Thóra B. Hafsteinsdóttir PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.profnurs.2025.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>PhD prepared nurses advance nursing science through research and integration of findings into practice. They demonstrate expertise in research, education, patient care, and policy. Various professional competencies are required for success in research, clinical practice, and education. Assessment of professional competencies is expected to stimulate competence and career development.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To reach consensus on professional competencies, develop an instrument to measure professional competencies of PhD prepared nurses and assess the content validity of the instrument.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A Delphi consensus and content validity study was conducted using online questionnaires completed by international PhD prepared nurse researchers. The relevance of and agreement with the competencies were measures using Likert-scales and open-ended questions to determine consensus. The Postdoctoral Nurses Competence Scale was developed, and its content validity evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Initially, four of 15 competencies were deemed ‘very’ or ‘fairly’ important by 18 PhD prepared nurses. In the second round with 13 adjusted competencies, eight competencies were rated ‘very’ or ‘fairly’ important. The content validity index scored 0.91.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Consensus was reached on most professional competencies, and the 13-item self-assessment instrument demonstrated excellent content validity. Further research is recommended to evaluate additional clinimetric properties before use of the instrument.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Nursing","volume":"57 ","pages":"Pages 43-52"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722325000092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

PhD prepared nurses advance nursing science through research and integration of findings into practice. They demonstrate expertise in research, education, patient care, and policy. Various professional competencies are required for success in research, clinical practice, and education. Assessment of professional competencies is expected to stimulate competence and career development.

Aim

To reach consensus on professional competencies, develop an instrument to measure professional competencies of PhD prepared nurses and assess the content validity of the instrument.

Method

A Delphi consensus and content validity study was conducted using online questionnaires completed by international PhD prepared nurse researchers. The relevance of and agreement with the competencies were measures using Likert-scales and open-ended questions to determine consensus. The Postdoctoral Nurses Competence Scale was developed, and its content validity evaluated.

Results

Initially, four of 15 competencies were deemed ‘very’ or ‘fairly’ important by 18 PhD prepared nurses. In the second round with 13 adjusted competencies, eight competencies were rated ‘very’ or ‘fairly’ important. The content validity index scored 0.91.

Conclusion

Consensus was reached on most professional competencies, and the 13-item self-assessment instrument demonstrated excellent content validity. Further research is recommended to evaluate additional clinimetric properties before use of the instrument.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal will accept articles that focus on baccalaureate and higher degree nursing education, educational research, policy related to education, and education and practice partnerships. Reports of original work, research, reviews, insightful descriptions, and policy papers focusing on baccalaureate and graduate nursing education will be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信