Effect of video-based trauma-informed care training for nursing staff on seclusion and restraint of psychiatric inpatients: A non-randomized controlled study

IF 3.1 Q1 NURSING
Michi Miyake , Megumi Hazumi , Kentaro Usuda , Takahiro Kawashima , Maiko Fukasawa , Hisateru Tachimori , Daisuke Nishi
{"title":"Effect of video-based trauma-informed care training for nursing staff on seclusion and restraint of psychiatric inpatients: A non-randomized controlled study","authors":"Michi Miyake ,&nbsp;Megumi Hazumi ,&nbsp;Kentaro Usuda ,&nbsp;Takahiro Kawashima ,&nbsp;Maiko Fukasawa ,&nbsp;Hisateru Tachimori ,&nbsp;Daisuke Nishi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Trauma-informed care, based on the belief that past traumatic experiences induce problematic behavior, is being promoted through various initiatives in the United States and other countries. The specific effect of training that focuses solely on trauma-informed care for reducing seclusion and restraint in psychiatric settings remains unknown. In this non-randomized controlled trial, we examined the effectiveness of a video-based trauma-informed care training program for nursing staff, with seclusion and restraint times as the outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Six of the 11 participating hospitals interested in trauma-informed care training were allocated to the intervention group, while the remaining five were assigned to the control group.The intervention ran from November 2021 to January 2022 in Japan. Data were collected using a specialized psychiatric monitoring system from April 2020 to October 2021 pre-intervention and from February 2022 to January 2023 post-intervention. The difference-in-differences analysis compared seclusion and restraint times between the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the data collection period, one hospital in the intervention group was excluded due to a change in ward function. Patients admitted to the remaining hospitals (5,050 in the intervention group and 4,830 in the control group) were included in the analysis. The analysis showed that the estimated difference-in-differences coefficient of average restraint time decreased significantly by -0.24 (<em>p</em> = 0.01) at 6 months post-intervention, although seclusion time was not significantly decreased.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>From the results of this non-randomized controlled trial, we found that video training focused solely on trauma-informed care may effectively reduce restraint time for inpatients. This accessible approach has the potential for broader adoption in clinical practice and may help reduce the use of coercive measures.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>The study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry on 31 October 2021 (UMIN-CTR ID: UMIN000045879).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100297"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X25000074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Trauma-informed care, based on the belief that past traumatic experiences induce problematic behavior, is being promoted through various initiatives in the United States and other countries. The specific effect of training that focuses solely on trauma-informed care for reducing seclusion and restraint in psychiatric settings remains unknown. In this non-randomized controlled trial, we examined the effectiveness of a video-based trauma-informed care training program for nursing staff, with seclusion and restraint times as the outcome.

Methods

Six of the 11 participating hospitals interested in trauma-informed care training were allocated to the intervention group, while the remaining five were assigned to the control group.The intervention ran from November 2021 to January 2022 in Japan. Data were collected using a specialized psychiatric monitoring system from April 2020 to October 2021 pre-intervention and from February 2022 to January 2023 post-intervention. The difference-in-differences analysis compared seclusion and restraint times between the groups.

Results

During the data collection period, one hospital in the intervention group was excluded due to a change in ward function. Patients admitted to the remaining hospitals (5,050 in the intervention group and 4,830 in the control group) were included in the analysis. The analysis showed that the estimated difference-in-differences coefficient of average restraint time decreased significantly by -0.24 (p = 0.01) at 6 months post-intervention, although seclusion time was not significantly decreased.

Conclusions

From the results of this non-randomized controlled trial, we found that video training focused solely on trauma-informed care may effectively reduce restraint time for inpatients. This accessible approach has the potential for broader adoption in clinical practice and may help reduce the use of coercive measures.

Trial registration

The study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry on 31 October 2021 (UMIN-CTR ID: UMIN000045879).
基于视频的创伤知情护理培训对精神科住院患者隔离约束的影响:一项非随机对照研究
背景创伤知情护理,基于过去的创伤经历会诱发问题行为的信念,正在美国和其他国家通过各种倡议得到推广。培训的具体效果,只侧重于创伤知情的护理,以减少隔离和限制在精神病院仍然是未知的。在这项非随机对照试验中,我们以隔离和约束时间为结果,研究了基于视频的护理人员创伤护理培训计划的有效性。方法11家对创伤知情护理培训感兴趣的医院中,6家为干预组,5家为对照组。日本的干预从2021年11月持续到2022年1月。在干预前(2020年4月至2021年10月)和干预后(2022年2月至2023年1月),使用专门的精神监测系统收集数据。差异中差异分析比较各组之间的隔离和约束时间。结果在数据收集期间,干预组中有1家医院因病房功能改变而被排除。其余医院收治的患者(干预组5050例,对照组4830例)纳入分析。分析显示,在干预后6个月,平均隔离时间的估计差中差系数显著降低-0.24 (p = 0.01),但隔离时间没有显著减少。结论:从本非随机对照试验的结果来看,我们发现仅关注创伤知情护理的视频培训可以有效地减少住院患者的约束时间。这种可获得的方法有可能在临床实践中得到更广泛的采用,并可能有助于减少强制措施的使用。试验注册该研究于2021年10月31日在大学医院医学信息网络临床试验注册中心注册(UMIN-CTR ID: UMIN000045879)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信