HiBenchLLM: Historical Inquiry Benchmarking for Large Language Models

IF 2.7 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Mathieu Chartier , Nabil Dakkoune , Guillaume Bourgeois , Stéphane Jean
{"title":"HiBenchLLM: Historical Inquiry Benchmarking for Large Language Models","authors":"Mathieu Chartier ,&nbsp;Nabil Dakkoune ,&nbsp;Guillaume Bourgeois ,&nbsp;Stéphane Jean","doi":"10.1016/j.datak.2024.102383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT or Bard have significantly transformed information retrieval and captured the public’s attention with their ability to generate customized responses across various topics. In this paper, we analyze the capabilities of different LLMs to generate responses related to historical facts in French. Our objective is to evaluate their reliability, comprehensiveness, and relevance for direct usability or extraction. To accomplish this, we propose a benchmark consisting of numerous historical questions covering various types, themes, and difficulty levels. Our evaluation of responses provided by 14 selected LLMs reveals several limitations in both content and structure. In addition to an overall insufficient precision rate, we observe uneven treatment of the French language, along with issues related to verbosity and inconsistency in the responses generated by LLMs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55184,"journal":{"name":"Data & Knowledge Engineering","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 102383"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data & Knowledge Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169023X24001071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT or Bard have significantly transformed information retrieval and captured the public’s attention with their ability to generate customized responses across various topics. In this paper, we analyze the capabilities of different LLMs to generate responses related to historical facts in French. Our objective is to evaluate their reliability, comprehensiveness, and relevance for direct usability or extraction. To accomplish this, we propose a benchmark consisting of numerous historical questions covering various types, themes, and difficulty levels. Our evaluation of responses provided by 14 selected LLMs reveals several limitations in both content and structure. In addition to an overall insufficient precision rate, we observe uneven treatment of the French language, along with issues related to verbosity and inconsistency in the responses generated by LLMs.
HiBenchLLM:大型语言模型的历史查询基准测试
大型语言模型(llm),如ChatGPT或Bard,已经显著地改变了信息检索,并凭借其在各种主题上生成定制响应的能力吸引了公众的注意力。在本文中,我们分析了不同法学硕士的能力,以产生与法语历史事实相关的反应。我们的目标是评估它们的可靠性、全面性和直接可用性或提取的相关性。为了实现这一目标,我们提出了一个由许多历史问题组成的基准,这些问题涵盖了各种类型、主题和难度。我们对选定的14位法学硕士提供的回复进行了评估,发现在内容和结构上都存在一些局限性。除了总体准确率不足外,我们还观察到法语的处理不均衡,以及法学硕士产生的回答中存在冗长和不一致的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Data & Knowledge Engineering
Data & Knowledge Engineering 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Data & Knowledge Engineering (DKE) stimulates the exchange of ideas and interaction between these two related fields of interest. DKE reaches a world-wide audience of researchers, designers, managers and users. The major aim of the journal is to identify, investigate and analyze the underlying principles in the design and effective use of these systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信