GGE biplot analysis for yield performance and stability of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) genotypes under multi environmental condition

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Gizachew Yilma Kebede, Kedir Yimam Assen, Aliyi Robsa Shuro
{"title":"GGE biplot analysis for yield performance and stability of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) genotypes under multi environmental condition","authors":"Gizachew Yilma Kebede,&nbsp;Kedir Yimam Assen,&nbsp;Aliyi Robsa Shuro","doi":"10.1016/j.egg.2025.100325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The presence of genotype × environment interactions (GEI) remains a major issue for crop improvement. The study was conducted to identify best performing, high yielding, and stable faba bean genotypes across different growing environments. Thirteen advanced faba bean genotypes were evaluated using RCBD with four replications at six environments in Ethiopia. The results of combined analysis of variance indicated that highly significant (p &lt; 0.01) differences observed among environments, and genotype × environment interaction, but non-significant genotypic difference for grain yield. The results revealed that faba bean genotypes performed differently in different environmental conditions, and the interaction was crossover in nature. The GGE biplot analysis showed that PC1 and PC2 accounted for 31.8 % and 22.0 % of the genotype × environment sum of squares respectively. The accessions that performed best in each environment based on the “mean vs stability”, are genotypes Gora, EH 08035-1, EH 08035-3 and EH 09031-4; however, based on the “which-won-where” polygon, G8 (EH 06007-4), G3 (EK 05037-4), G11 (EH 08035-1), G2 (EH 010010-1), and G9 (EH 09031-4) are desirable genotypes. In terms of discriminating and representativeness of the environments, Env-1, and Env-6 considered as the most superior environment, while Env-4 and Env-5 were consistently non-discriminating environments they give little information. The result gives more information on the stability and genotype × environment interactions of faba bean genotypes for future breeding programs. Thus, the selected accessions are recommended as parental lines in future breeding programs for faba bean yield improvement in different agro-ecological zones of Ethiopia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37938,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Genetics and Genomics","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Genetics and Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405985425000047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The presence of genotype × environment interactions (GEI) remains a major issue for crop improvement. The study was conducted to identify best performing, high yielding, and stable faba bean genotypes across different growing environments. Thirteen advanced faba bean genotypes were evaluated using RCBD with four replications at six environments in Ethiopia. The results of combined analysis of variance indicated that highly significant (p < 0.01) differences observed among environments, and genotype × environment interaction, but non-significant genotypic difference for grain yield. The results revealed that faba bean genotypes performed differently in different environmental conditions, and the interaction was crossover in nature. The GGE biplot analysis showed that PC1 and PC2 accounted for 31.8 % and 22.0 % of the genotype × environment sum of squares respectively. The accessions that performed best in each environment based on the “mean vs stability”, are genotypes Gora, EH 08035-1, EH 08035-3 and EH 09031-4; however, based on the “which-won-where” polygon, G8 (EH 06007-4), G3 (EK 05037-4), G11 (EH 08035-1), G2 (EH 010010-1), and G9 (EH 09031-4) are desirable genotypes. In terms of discriminating and representativeness of the environments, Env-1, and Env-6 considered as the most superior environment, while Env-4 and Env-5 were consistently non-discriminating environments they give little information. The result gives more information on the stability and genotype × environment interactions of faba bean genotypes for future breeding programs. Thus, the selected accessions are recommended as parental lines in future breeding programs for faba bean yield improvement in different agro-ecological zones of Ethiopia.
多环境条件下蚕豆(Vicia faba L.)基因型产量性能及稳定性的GGE双图分析
基因型与环境相互作用(GEI)的存在仍然是作物改良的一个主要问题。本研究旨在确定在不同生长环境下表现最佳、高产且稳定的蚕豆基因型。利用RCBD在埃塞俄比亚的6种环境中进行了4次重复,对13种高级蚕豆基因型进行了评估。综合方差分析结果表明,两组间差异极显著(p <;籽粒产量在不同环境间差异显著(0.01),基因型与环境互作差异不显著。结果表明,蚕豆基因型在不同环境条件下表现不同,具有交叉互作性质。GGE双标图分析显示,PC1和PC2分别占基因型×环境平方和的31.8%和22.0%。在各环境中表现最好的品种为Gora、EH 08035-1、EH 08035-3和EH 09031-4;然而,基于“哪个赢在哪里”多边形,G8 (EH 06007-4), G3 (EK 05037-4), G11 (EH 08035-1), G2 (EH 010010-1)和G9 (EH 09031-4)是理想的基因型。在环境的歧视性和代表性方面,Env-1和Env-6被认为是最优越的环境,而Env-4和Env-5一直是无歧视性的环境,它们提供的信息很少。该结果为蚕豆基因型的稳定性和基因型与环境的相互作用提供了更多的信息,为未来的育种计划提供参考。因此,所选材料可作为埃塞俄比亚不同农业生态区蚕豆产量改良的亲本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Genetics and Genomics
Ecological Genetics and Genomics Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Ecological Genetics and Genomics publishes ecological studies of broad interest that provide significant insight into ecological interactions or/ and species diversification. New data in these areas are published as research papers, or methods and resource reports that provide novel information on technologies or tools that will be of interest to a broad readership. Complete data sets are shared where appropriate. The journal also provides Reviews, and Perspectives articles, which present commentary on the latest advances published both here and elsewhere, placing such progress in its broader biological context. Topics include: -metagenomics -population genetics/genomics -evolutionary ecology -conservation and molecular adaptation -speciation genetics -environmental and marine genomics -ecological simulation -genomic divergence of organisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信