Development of a New Malnutrition Screening Tool for Patients: Human Key Tool of Nutrition

Kotono Oishi MSc, Arisa Inoue-Hamano PhD, Yasuhiro Hamada MD,PhD
{"title":"Development of a New Malnutrition Screening Tool for Patients: Human Key Tool of Nutrition","authors":"Kotono Oishi MSc,&nbsp;Arisa Inoue-Hamano PhD,&nbsp;Yasuhiro Hamada MD,PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2024.100086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Malnutrition is related to increased mortality and poor outcome. Therefore, early diagnosis and intervention of malnutrition are recommended. However, the optimal nutrition screening tool for diagnosing malnutrition remains undetermined. This study aimed to verify the discrimination and difficulty of nutrition screening items through item response theory (IRT) analysis and develop a simpler malnutrition screening tool.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study enrolled 10,375 patients aged ≥18 years who were admitted at Tokushima University Hospital. Patients who were pregnant had short-term hospitalization (≤3 days), were hospitalized only in the weekend, could not hear clearly, and were hospitalized merely for examination were excluded. A skilled dietitian performed the Subjective Global Assessment, rating a good nutritional status as A, moderate malnutrition as B, and severe malnutrition as C.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>According to Subjective Global Assessment, we classified 7119 patients as A, 2892 as B, and 364 as C. Between these classes, the total number of application items was significantly lower in class A but significantly higher in class C. In the discrimination of each item calculated by IRT analysis, the highest discrimination item was “Has your food intake been less than usual?”, followed by “Have you had anorexia?”, “Have you had vomiting?”, “Have you had nausea?”, “Have you had dehydration?”, and “Have you lost weight?”.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Human Key Tool of Nutrition, which is based on the IRT analysis results, is a new simple nutrition screening tool developed by us. Human Key Tool of Nutrition can contribute to the widespread use of nutrition screening.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100086"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medicine open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667036424000232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

Malnutrition is related to increased mortality and poor outcome. Therefore, early diagnosis and intervention of malnutrition are recommended. However, the optimal nutrition screening tool for diagnosing malnutrition remains undetermined. This study aimed to verify the discrimination and difficulty of nutrition screening items through item response theory (IRT) analysis and develop a simpler malnutrition screening tool.

Methods

This study enrolled 10,375 patients aged ≥18 years who were admitted at Tokushima University Hospital. Patients who were pregnant had short-term hospitalization (≤3 days), were hospitalized only in the weekend, could not hear clearly, and were hospitalized merely for examination were excluded. A skilled dietitian performed the Subjective Global Assessment, rating a good nutritional status as A, moderate malnutrition as B, and severe malnutrition as C.

Results

According to Subjective Global Assessment, we classified 7119 patients as A, 2892 as B, and 364 as C. Between these classes, the total number of application items was significantly lower in class A but significantly higher in class C. In the discrimination of each item calculated by IRT analysis, the highest discrimination item was “Has your food intake been less than usual?”, followed by “Have you had anorexia?”, “Have you had vomiting?”, “Have you had nausea?”, “Have you had dehydration?”, and “Have you lost weight?”.

Conclusions

Human Key Tool of Nutrition, which is based on the IRT analysis results, is a new simple nutrition screening tool developed by us. Human Key Tool of Nutrition can contribute to the widespread use of nutrition screening.

Abstract Image

一种新的患者营养不良筛查工具的开发:人类营养关键工具
背景和目的营养不良与死亡率增加和预后不良有关。因此,建议对营养不良进行早期诊断和干预。然而,诊断营养不良的最佳营养筛查工具仍未确定。本研究旨在通过项目反应理论(IRT)分析验证营养筛查项目的甄别性和难度,并开发一种更简单的营养不良筛查工具。方法本研究纳入德岛大学附属医院年龄≥18岁的10375例患者。排除短期住院(≤3天)、仅在周末住院、听不清、仅为检查住院的孕妇。由一名熟练的营养师进行主观整体评估,将营养状况良好的患者评为A级,中度营养不良的患者评为B级,重度营养不良的患者评为c级。结果根据主观整体评估,我们将7119例患者分为A级,2892例为B级,364例为c级。在这三个类别之间,A类的应用项目总数明显低于c类,而c类的应用项目总数明显高于A类。歧视程度最高的项目是“你的食物摄入量比平时少吗?”,然后是“你有厌食症吗?”、“你呕吐过吗?”、“你恶心吗?”、“你脱水了吗?”、“你瘦了吗?”结论基于IRT分析结果开发的“人类营养关键工具”是我们开发的一种新型、简便的营养筛选工具。人类营养关键工具可以促进营养筛选的广泛使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of medicine open
American journal of medicine open Medicine and Dentistry (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信