Development of a New Malnutrition Screening Tool for Patients: Human Key Tool of Nutrition

Kotono Oishi MSc, Arisa Inoue-Hamano PhD, Yasuhiro Hamada MD,PhD
{"title":"Development of a New Malnutrition Screening Tool for Patients: Human Key Tool of Nutrition","authors":"Kotono Oishi MSc,&nbsp;Arisa Inoue-Hamano PhD,&nbsp;Yasuhiro Hamada MD,PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2024.100086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Malnutrition is related to increased mortality and poor outcome. Therefore, early diagnosis and intervention of malnutrition are recommended. However, the optimal nutrition screening tool for diagnosing malnutrition remains undetermined. This study aimed to verify the discrimination and difficulty of nutrition screening items through item response theory (IRT) analysis and develop a simpler malnutrition screening tool.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study enrolled 10,375 patients aged ≥18 years who were admitted at Tokushima University Hospital. Patients who were pregnant had short-term hospitalization (≤3 days), were hospitalized only in the weekend, could not hear clearly, and were hospitalized merely for examination were excluded. A skilled dietitian performed the Subjective Global Assessment, rating a good nutritional status as A, moderate malnutrition as B, and severe malnutrition as C.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>According to Subjective Global Assessment, we classified 7119 patients as A, 2892 as B, and 364 as C. Between these classes, the total number of application items was significantly lower in class A but significantly higher in class C. In the discrimination of each item calculated by IRT analysis, the highest discrimination item was “Has your food intake been less than usual?”, followed by “Have you had anorexia?”, “Have you had vomiting?”, “Have you had nausea?”, “Have you had dehydration?”, and “Have you lost weight?”.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Human Key Tool of Nutrition, which is based on the IRT analysis results, is a new simple nutrition screening tool developed by us. Human Key Tool of Nutrition can contribute to the widespread use of nutrition screening.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100086"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medicine open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667036424000232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

Malnutrition is related to increased mortality and poor outcome. Therefore, early diagnosis and intervention of malnutrition are recommended. However, the optimal nutrition screening tool for diagnosing malnutrition remains undetermined. This study aimed to verify the discrimination and difficulty of nutrition screening items through item response theory (IRT) analysis and develop a simpler malnutrition screening tool.

Methods

This study enrolled 10,375 patients aged ≥18 years who were admitted at Tokushima University Hospital. Patients who were pregnant had short-term hospitalization (≤3 days), were hospitalized only in the weekend, could not hear clearly, and were hospitalized merely for examination were excluded. A skilled dietitian performed the Subjective Global Assessment, rating a good nutritional status as A, moderate malnutrition as B, and severe malnutrition as C.

Results

According to Subjective Global Assessment, we classified 7119 patients as A, 2892 as B, and 364 as C. Between these classes, the total number of application items was significantly lower in class A but significantly higher in class C. In the discrimination of each item calculated by IRT analysis, the highest discrimination item was “Has your food intake been less than usual?”, followed by “Have you had anorexia?”, “Have you had vomiting?”, “Have you had nausea?”, “Have you had dehydration?”, and “Have you lost weight?”.

Conclusions

Human Key Tool of Nutrition, which is based on the IRT analysis results, is a new simple nutrition screening tool developed by us. Human Key Tool of Nutrition can contribute to the widespread use of nutrition screening.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of medicine open
American journal of medicine open Medicine and Dentistry (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信