Does manual therapy improve pain, disability, and glenohumeral motion in overhead athletes? Systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.1 4区医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ijosm.2025.100747

Sávio Douglas Ferreira Santana , Vander Gava , Valéria Mayaly Alves de Oliveira , Gabriel Alves dos Santos , Tássio Augusto Soares Lima , Danilo Harudy Kamonseki

{"title":"Does manual therapy improve pain, disability, and glenohumeral motion in overhead athletes? Systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Sávio Douglas Ferreira Santana , Vander Gava , Valéria Mayaly Alves de Oliveira , Gabriel Alves dos Santos , Tássio Augusto Soares Lima , Danilo Harudy Kamonseki","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2025.100747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To systematically review the effects of manual therapy (MT) on pain intensity, disability, internal rotation (IR), external rotation (ER), and horizontal adduction (HA) range of motion (ROM) in overhead athletes.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>Databases (Medline, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and SCOPUS) were searched from inception up to May 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Study selection</h3><div>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MT to a non-treatment group or other treatment groups were selected.</div></div><div><h3>Data extraction</h3><div>Two reviewers independently selected RCTs that investigated the effects of MT on pain intensity, disability, IR, ER, and HA ROM.</div></div><div><h3>Data synthesis</h3><div>Mean difference or Standardized Mean Differences, along with 95 % confidence intervals, were calculated for the meta-analysis of each outcome of interest. The level of evidence was synthesized using GRADE.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twelve RCTs were included, with a pooled sample of 401 athletes. MT was not superior (p > 0.05) to no treatment in improving pain, disability, IR ROM, and ER ROM, but it was superior to no treatments in improving HA. MT was not superior (p > 0.05) to other treatments in improving ER ROM and HA ROM, but it was superior other treatments in improving IR ROM and disability. Those findings were based on very low certainty of evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>MT may not effectively improve pain and ER ROM. The very low quality of evidence, conflicting findings regarding the effects of MT on disability and IR, and the small, likely clinically irrelevant effects on HA, do not provide sufficient support for a definitive recommendation regarding the effectiveness of MT for treating overhead athletes.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div><ul><li><span>-</span><span><div>Manual therapy may not effectively improve pain intensity and glenohumeral external rotation range of motion.</div></span></li><li><span>-</span><span><div>Manual therapy showed conflicting effects on disability and glenohumeral internal rotation range of motion.</div></span></li><li><span>-</span><span><div>Manual therapy showed small and clinically irrelevant effects on horizontal adduction range of motion.</div></span></li><li><span>-</span><span><div>No significant difference was observed among different manual therapy techniques.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 100747"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746068925000033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To systematically review the effects of manual therapy (MT) on pain intensity, disability, internal rotation (IR), external rotation (ER), and horizontal adduction (HA) range of motion (ROM) in overhead athletes.

Data sources

Databases (Medline, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and SCOPUS) were searched from inception up to May 2023.

Study selection

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MT to a non-treatment group or other treatment groups were selected.

Data extraction

Two reviewers independently selected RCTs that investigated the effects of MT on pain intensity, disability, IR, ER, and HA ROM.

Data synthesis

Mean difference or Standardized Mean Differences, along with 95 % confidence intervals, were calculated for the meta-analysis of each outcome of interest. The level of evidence was synthesized using GRADE.

Results

Twelve RCTs were included, with a pooled sample of 401 athletes. MT was not superior (p > 0.05) to no treatment in improving pain, disability, IR ROM, and ER ROM, but it was superior to no treatments in improving HA. MT was not superior (p > 0.05) to other treatments in improving ER ROM and HA ROM, but it was superior other treatments in improving IR ROM and disability. Those findings were based on very low certainty of evidence.

Conclusion

MT may not effectively improve pain and ER ROM. The very low quality of evidence, conflicting findings regarding the effects of MT on disability and IR, and the small, likely clinically irrelevant effects on HA, do not provide sufficient support for a definitive recommendation regarding the effectiveness of MT for treating overhead athletes.

Implications for practice

-
Manual therapy may not effectively improve pain intensity and glenohumeral external rotation range of motion.
-
Manual therapy showed conflicting effects on disability and glenohumeral internal rotation range of motion.
-
Manual therapy showed small and clinically irrelevant effects on horizontal adduction range of motion.
-
No significant difference was observed among different manual therapy techniques.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine 医学-医学：内科

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

36.80%

发文量

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine is a peer-reviewed journal that provides for the publication of high quality research articles and review papers that are as broad as the many disciplines that influence and underpin the principles and practice of osteopathic medicine. Particular emphasis is given to basic science research, clinical epidemiology and health social science in relation to osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine. The Editorial Board encourages submission of articles based on both quantitative and qualitative research designs. The Editorial Board also aims to provide a forum for discourse and debate on any aspect of osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine with the aim of critically evaluating existing practices in regard to the diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neuromusculoskeletal disorders and somatic dysfunction. All manuscripts submitted to the IJOM are subject to a blinded review process. The categories currently available for publication include reports of original research, review papers, commentaries and articles related to clinical practice, including case reports. Further details can be found in the IJOM Instructions for Authors. Manuscripts are accepted for publication with the understanding that no substantial part has been, or will be published elsewhere.