Data-driven assessment of the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions on Covid spread mitigation in Italy

Q2 Health Professions
Divya Pragna Mulla , Mario Alessandro Bochicchio , Antonella Longo
{"title":"Data-driven assessment of the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions on Covid spread mitigation in Italy","authors":"Divya Pragna Mulla ,&nbsp;Mario Alessandro Bochicchio ,&nbsp;Antonella Longo","doi":"10.1016/j.smhl.2024.100524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To mitigate the impact of pandemics such as COVID-19, governments can implement various Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs), ranging from the use of personal protective equipment to social distancing measures. While it has been demonstrated that NPIs can be effective over time, the assessment of their efficacy and the estimation of their cost-benefit ratio are still debated issues. For COVID-19, several authors have used case confirmation as a key parameter to assess the efficacy of NPIs. In this paper, we compare the efficacy of this parameter to that of the death rate, hospitalizations, and intensive care unit cases, in conjunction with human mobility indicators, in evaluating the effectiveness of NPIs. Our research uses data on daily COVID-19 cases and deaths, intensive care unit cases, hospitalizations, Google Mobility Reports, and NPI data from all Italian regions from March 2020 to May 2022. The evaluation method is based on the approach proposed by Wang et al., in 2020 to assess the impact of NPI efficacy and understand the effect of other parameters. Our results indicate that, when combined with human mobility indicators, the mortality rate and the number of intensive care units perform better than the number of cases in determining the efficacy of NPIs. These findings can assist policymakers in developing the best data-driven methods for dealing with confinement problems and planning for future outbreaks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37151,"journal":{"name":"Smart Health","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100524"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352648324000801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To mitigate the impact of pandemics such as COVID-19, governments can implement various Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs), ranging from the use of personal protective equipment to social distancing measures. While it has been demonstrated that NPIs can be effective over time, the assessment of their efficacy and the estimation of their cost-benefit ratio are still debated issues. For COVID-19, several authors have used case confirmation as a key parameter to assess the efficacy of NPIs. In this paper, we compare the efficacy of this parameter to that of the death rate, hospitalizations, and intensive care unit cases, in conjunction with human mobility indicators, in evaluating the effectiveness of NPIs. Our research uses data on daily COVID-19 cases and deaths, intensive care unit cases, hospitalizations, Google Mobility Reports, and NPI data from all Italian regions from March 2020 to May 2022. The evaluation method is based on the approach proposed by Wang et al., in 2020 to assess the impact of NPI efficacy and understand the effect of other parameters. Our results indicate that, when combined with human mobility indicators, the mortality rate and the number of intensive care units perform better than the number of cases in determining the efficacy of NPIs. These findings can assist policymakers in developing the best data-driven methods for dealing with confinement problems and planning for future outbreaks.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Smart Health
Smart Health Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信