{"title":"EXPRESSION OF CONCERN: The Labour Scale—Assessment of the Validity of a Novel Labour Chart: A Pilot Study†","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>EXPRESSION OF CONCERN:</b> S. A. M. Shazly, L. H. O. Embaby, and S. S. Ali. “The Labour Scale—Assessment of the Validity of a Novel Labour Chart: A Pilot Study†.” <i>Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology</i> 54, no. 4 (2014): 322–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12209.</p><p>This Expression of Concern for the above article published online on 17 May 2014 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) has been published by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Scott White; The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; and John Wiley & Sons Australia Ltd. The Expression of Concern has been agreed due to concerns raised about the accuracy of the mean age of nullipara and multipara presented in Table 1. Furthermore, the feasibility of the 1-min APGAR scores listed in Table 1 was also questioned. The authors provided an explanation and an incomplete data set excluding some of the results flagged as implausible. This was not considered satisfactory, thus the journal has decided to issue an Expression of Concern to alert the readers.</p>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":"65 1","pages":"177"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajo.13938","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajo.13938","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
EXPRESSION OF CONCERN: S. A. M. Shazly, L. H. O. Embaby, and S. S. Ali. “The Labour Scale—Assessment of the Validity of a Novel Labour Chart: A Pilot Study†.” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 54, no. 4 (2014): 322–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12209.
This Expression of Concern for the above article published online on 17 May 2014 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) has been published by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Scott White; The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; and John Wiley & Sons Australia Ltd. The Expression of Concern has been agreed due to concerns raised about the accuracy of the mean age of nullipara and multipara presented in Table 1. Furthermore, the feasibility of the 1-min APGAR scores listed in Table 1 was also questioned. The authors provided an explanation and an incomplete data set excluding some of the results flagged as implausible. This was not considered satisfactory, thus the journal has decided to issue an Expression of Concern to alert the readers.
关注表达:S. A. M. Shazly, L. H. O. Embaby和S. S. Ali。劳动量表-评估一种新型劳动图表的有效性:一项试点研究*《澳大利亚和新西兰妇产科杂志》,第54期。4(2014): 322-326。https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12209.This对上述文章的关注表达于2014年5月17日发表在Wiley在线图书馆(wileyonlinelibrary.com)上,经期刊主编Scott White同意,该文章已被发表;澳大利亚和新西兰皇家妇产科学院;约翰·威利&;澳大利亚之子有限公司由于对表1所列无明文规定者和有明文规定者的平均年龄的准确性表示关注,因此同意发表关注声明。此外,表1所列的1分钟APGAR评分的可行性也受到质疑。作者提供了一个解释和一个不完整的数据集,排除了一些被标记为不可信的结果。这并不令人满意,因此该杂志决定发布一份关注表达,以提醒读者。
期刊介绍:
The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.