Evaluating patient-reported health outcome profiles of lower limb orthosis users.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Geoffrey S Balkman, Brian J Hafner, Alyssa M Bamer, Rana Salem, Sara J Morgan, Phillip M Stevens, Eric L Weber
{"title":"Evaluating patient-reported health outcome profiles of lower limb orthosis users.","authors":"Geoffrey S Balkman, Brian J Hafner, Alyssa M Bamer, Rana Salem, Sara J Morgan, Phillip M Stevens, Eric L Weber","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2458195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To construct self-reported health outcomes profiles of lower limb orthosis users and compare scores to a normative sample representative of the United States general population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey, which included the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Profile v2.0 (PROMIS-29), was administered to a national sample of adult lower limb orthosis users who had at least 6 months of experience using their orthosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relative to the U.S. general population, the 1,036 study participants report significantly worse anxiety, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, and ability to participate in social roles and activities (all <i>p</i> < 0.001). Differences in pain interference, physical function, and ability to participate in social roles and activities were all greater than 5 points. Subgroup analyses indicate those who also use assistive devices (e.g. canes, walkers) in addition to their orthoses generally have worse scores across multiple PROMIS domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results of this study indicate lower limb orthosis users, as a group, report significantly worse health outcomes than the general population. These findings highlight health constructs that may be important to assess in clinical care and research and provide references scores for this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2458195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To construct self-reported health outcomes profiles of lower limb orthosis users and compare scores to a normative sample representative of the United States general population.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional online survey, which included the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Profile v2.0 (PROMIS-29), was administered to a national sample of adult lower limb orthosis users who had at least 6 months of experience using their orthosis.

Results: Relative to the U.S. general population, the 1,036 study participants report significantly worse anxiety, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, and ability to participate in social roles and activities (all p < 0.001). Differences in pain interference, physical function, and ability to participate in social roles and activities were all greater than 5 points. Subgroup analyses indicate those who also use assistive devices (e.g. canes, walkers) in addition to their orthoses generally have worse scores across multiple PROMIS domains.

Conclusions: Results of this study indicate lower limb orthosis users, as a group, report significantly worse health outcomes than the general population. These findings highlight health constructs that may be important to assess in clinical care and research and provide references scores for this patient population.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信