Scoping review indicates heterogeneous methods for developing and integrating patient decision aids in the context of clinical practice guidelines

IF 7.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lena Fischer , Leon Vincent Schewe , Fülöp Scheibler , Rahel Wollny , Corinna Schaefer , Torsten Karge , Thomas Langer , Jan Berghold , Ivan D. Florez , Andrew Hutchinson , Sheyu Li , Marta Maes-Carballo , Zachary Munn , Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez , Livia Puljak , Anne Stiggelbout , Dawid Pieper
{"title":"Scoping review indicates heterogeneous methods for developing and integrating patient decision aids in the context of clinical practice guidelines","authors":"Lena Fischer ,&nbsp;Leon Vincent Schewe ,&nbsp;Fülöp Scheibler ,&nbsp;Rahel Wollny ,&nbsp;Corinna Schaefer ,&nbsp;Torsten Karge ,&nbsp;Thomas Langer ,&nbsp;Jan Berghold ,&nbsp;Ivan D. Florez ,&nbsp;Andrew Hutchinson ,&nbsp;Sheyu Li ,&nbsp;Marta Maes-Carballo ,&nbsp;Zachary Munn ,&nbsp;Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez ,&nbsp;Livia Puljak ,&nbsp;Anne Stiggelbout ,&nbsp;Dawid Pieper","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To review the methods used to develop and integrate patient decision aids (PDAs) based on the recommendations of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Setting</h3><div>We conducted a scoping review covering bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase; searched until December 2023), gray literature, references, and expert consultations to identify eligible documents. Documents published from 2000 onwards and describing methods related to guideline-based PDA development or linking CPGs and PDAs were included. Two reviewers independently selected and analyzed the documents. Results were synthesized and presented narratively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Based on 24 included documents, we categorized their methods into 4 topics. For topic (1), the selection of CPG recommendations for which PDAs are (most) needed, we found a total of 14 selection factors across <em>n</em> = 11 documents, with uncertainty/variability in patient preferences and trade-offs between options being the most frequently mentioned. Topic (2) (<em>n</em> = 24) covers methods for developing and/or updating guideline-based PDAs, such as forming a multidisciplinary development group, using CPGs and their evidence summaries along with other sources as the evidence base, and using digital solutions for semi-automated development and updating. Topic (3) (<em>n</em> = 12) covers methods for PDA quality assessment and/or user testing, such as finalizing and approving the PDAs after a review and feedback process from the CPG group and an iterative user testing process. Topic (4) (<em>n</em> = 20) covers methods for linking CPGs and PDAs, often through digital strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We identified heterogeneous methods for developing and integrating PDAs based on CPG recommendations. Empirical testing is required to determine the most useful and practically feasible (combination of) methods. CPG organizations should focus on establishing adequate methods for linking CPG and PDA development to foster shared decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 111708"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435625000411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To review the methods used to develop and integrate patient decision aids (PDAs) based on the recommendations of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).

Study Design and Setting

We conducted a scoping review covering bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase; searched until December 2023), gray literature, references, and expert consultations to identify eligible documents. Documents published from 2000 onwards and describing methods related to guideline-based PDA development or linking CPGs and PDAs were included. Two reviewers independently selected and analyzed the documents. Results were synthesized and presented narratively.

Results

Based on 24 included documents, we categorized their methods into 4 topics. For topic (1), the selection of CPG recommendations for which PDAs are (most) needed, we found a total of 14 selection factors across n = 11 documents, with uncertainty/variability in patient preferences and trade-offs between options being the most frequently mentioned. Topic (2) (n = 24) covers methods for developing and/or updating guideline-based PDAs, such as forming a multidisciplinary development group, using CPGs and their evidence summaries along with other sources as the evidence base, and using digital solutions for semi-automated development and updating. Topic (3) (n = 12) covers methods for PDA quality assessment and/or user testing, such as finalizing and approving the PDAs after a review and feedback process from the CPG group and an iterative user testing process. Topic (4) (n = 20) covers methods for linking CPGs and PDAs, often through digital strategies.

Conclusion

We identified heterogeneous methods for developing and integrating PDAs based on CPG recommendations. Empirical testing is required to determine the most useful and practically feasible (combination of) methods. CPG organizations should focus on establishing adequate methods for linking CPG and PDA development to foster shared decision-making.
范围审查表明,在临床实践指南的背景下,开发和整合患者决策辅助工具的方法不同。
目的:回顾基于临床实践指南(CPGs)的建议开发和整合患者决策辅助(pda)的方法。研究设计和设置:我们对文献数据库(PubMed, Embase;检索至2023年12月)、灰色文献、参考文献和专家咨询,以确定合格的文件。从2000年开始发表的文件,描述了与基于指南的PDA开发或连接CPGs和PDA相关的方法。两名审稿人独立选择并分析了这些文件。对结果进行综合叙述。结果:根据纳入的24篇文献,我们将他们的方法分为四个主题。对于主题(1),即选择(最)需要pda的CPG建议,我们在n=11份文件中发现了总共14个选择因素,其中患者偏好的不确定性/可变性以及选项之间的权衡是最常提到的。主题(2)(n=24)涵盖了开发和/或更新基于指南的pda的方法,例如组建一个多学科开发小组,使用cpg及其证据摘要以及其他来源作为证据基础,以及使用数字解决方案进行半自动化开发和更新。主题(3)(n=12)涵盖PDA质量评估和/或用户测试的方法,例如在CPG小组的审查和反馈过程以及迭代的用户测试过程之后,最终确定和批准PDA。主题(4)(n=20)涵盖了通常通过数字策略连接cpg和pda的方法。结论:基于CPG推荐,我们确定了开发和整合pda的不同方法。需要进行经验检验,以确定最有用和最实际可行的(组合)方法。CPG组织应侧重于建立适当的方法,将CPG和PDA发展联系起来,以促进共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology strives to enhance the quality of clinical and patient-oriented healthcare research by advancing and applying innovative methods in conducting, presenting, synthesizing, disseminating, and translating research results into optimal clinical practice. Special emphasis is placed on training new generations of scientists and clinical practice leaders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信