Point-of-care tests in the emergency medical services: a scoping review.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
T H M Moore, S Dawson, K Kirby, R Body, A Thompson, Y O Adepoju, R Perry, H Nicholson, J Dinnes, K Mitchell, J Savović, S Voss, J R Benger
{"title":"Point-of-care tests in the emergency medical services: a scoping review.","authors":"T H M Moore, S Dawson, K Kirby, R Body, A Thompson, Y O Adepoju, R Perry, H Nicholson, J Dinnes, K Mitchell, J Savović, S Voss, J R Benger","doi":"10.1186/s13049-025-01329-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This scoping review aimed to summarize existing research on point-of-care tests (POCTs) within emergency medical services (EMS). There is a lack of comprehensive reviews covering the breadth and scope of application of POCTs in EMS despite growing interest and potential benefits in this setting. A review of the research will inform how we target future research efforts to support effective implementation and avoid duplication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched three databases to April 2023 using comprehensive terms for POCTs. One author screened titles and abstracts, full-text papers and extracted data with a second author checking the data. A scoping review framework was used to categorise studies according to demographics, study design, medical conditions, biomarkers and test devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 141 papers that included 158 reports of 9 study designs, 155 reports of 40 combinations of biomarker and condition and 161 reports of 41 test-devices. The majority of research was done in the UK (19%), US (17%), and the Netherlands (16%), mostly in land-based EMS (82%). Most frequently assessed were troponin for acute coronary syndromes (26%), lactate for sepsis (14%) or lactate for trauma/critical illness (13%). The majority of research designs investigated the accuracy of the tests (43%). Few studies were of a design to inform guidelines to change patient pathways and the associated outcomes, including, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (4%), non-randomised studies able to assess causality (6%), economic analyses (1%) or qualitative work on acceptability (3%). In those few cases where RCTs were done there were long delays between initial test-accuracy research and publication of the first RCT, for example 11 years delay for troponin for acute coronary syndromes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified a thriving base of research on POCT in the EMS, however most studies established the diagnostic accuracy of the tests with few RCTs, economic analyses or qualitative research on acceptability. The time-lag from diagnostic accuracy to developing an RCT is considerable. Investment in funding and infrastructure is needed to support the research pathway for potential POCTs beyond diagnostic accuracy to designs able to assess clinical effectiveness, acceptability and economic effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01329-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This scoping review aimed to summarize existing research on point-of-care tests (POCTs) within emergency medical services (EMS). There is a lack of comprehensive reviews covering the breadth and scope of application of POCTs in EMS despite growing interest and potential benefits in this setting. A review of the research will inform how we target future research efforts to support effective implementation and avoid duplication.

Methods: We searched three databases to April 2023 using comprehensive terms for POCTs. One author screened titles and abstracts, full-text papers and extracted data with a second author checking the data. A scoping review framework was used to categorise studies according to demographics, study design, medical conditions, biomarkers and test devices.

Results: We found 141 papers that included 158 reports of 9 study designs, 155 reports of 40 combinations of biomarker and condition and 161 reports of 41 test-devices. The majority of research was done in the UK (19%), US (17%), and the Netherlands (16%), mostly in land-based EMS (82%). Most frequently assessed were troponin for acute coronary syndromes (26%), lactate for sepsis (14%) or lactate for trauma/critical illness (13%). The majority of research designs investigated the accuracy of the tests (43%). Few studies were of a design to inform guidelines to change patient pathways and the associated outcomes, including, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (4%), non-randomised studies able to assess causality (6%), economic analyses (1%) or qualitative work on acceptability (3%). In those few cases where RCTs were done there were long delays between initial test-accuracy research and publication of the first RCT, for example 11 years delay for troponin for acute coronary syndromes.

Conclusions: We identified a thriving base of research on POCT in the EMS, however most studies established the diagnostic accuracy of the tests with few RCTs, economic analyses or qualitative research on acceptability. The time-lag from diagnostic accuracy to developing an RCT is considerable. Investment in funding and infrastructure is needed to support the research pathway for potential POCTs beyond diagnostic accuracy to designs able to assess clinical effectiveness, acceptability and economic effectiveness.

紧急医疗服务中的即时检测:范围审查
背景:本综述旨在总结急诊医疗服务(EMS)中护理点测试(POCTs)的现有研究。尽管对poct在EMS中的应用越来越感兴趣,并有潜在的好处,但缺乏涵盖其广度和范围的全面审查。对这项研究的审查将告知我们如何针对未来的研究工作,以支持有效实施和避免重复。方法:检索3个数据库至2023年4月的POCTs综合检索词。一名作者筛选标题和摘要、全文论文并提取数据,另一名作者检查数据。根据人口统计学、研究设计、医疗条件、生物标志物和测试设备,使用范围审查框架对研究进行分类。结果:我们发现141篇论文,其中包括9项研究设计的158篇报告,40种生物标志物和疾病组合的155篇报告,41种测试设备的161篇报告。大多数研究是在英国(19%)、美国(17%)和荷兰(16%)进行的,主要是在陆基EMS(82%)。最常见的评估是急性冠状动脉综合征的肌钙蛋白(26%),败血症的乳酸(14%)或创伤/危重疾病的乳酸(13%)。大多数研究设计调查了测试的准确性(43%)。很少有研究的目的是为改变患者途径和相关结果的指南提供信息,包括随机对照试验(rct)(4%)、能够评估因果关系的非随机研究(6%)、经济分析(1%)或可接受性的定性研究(3%)。在那些进行了随机对照试验的少数案例中,从最初的测试准确性研究到第一项随机对照试验的发表之间有很长的延迟,例如,用于急性冠状动脉综合征的肌钙蛋白延迟了11年。结论:我们确定了EMS中POCT研究的蓬勃发展基础,然而大多数研究建立了测试的诊断准确性,很少有随机对照试验,经济分析或可接受性的定性研究。从诊断准确性到发展随机对照试验的时间滞后是相当大的。需要在资金和基础设施方面进行投资,以支持潜在poct的研究途径,使其超越诊断准确性,设计出能够评估临床有效性、可接受性和经济效益的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信