Scope of practice of Japanese primary care physicians and its associated factors: a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Tomoya Higuchi, Mieko Nakamura, Toshiyuki Ojima, Machiko Inoue
{"title":"Scope of practice of Japanese primary care physicians and its associated factors: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Tomoya Higuchi, Mieko Nakamura, Toshiyuki Ojima, Machiko Inoue","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2024-003191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The scope of practice (SOP) of primary care physicians (PCPs) has been narrowing, with declining comprehensiveness leading to fragmented care. Identifying SOP-associated factors can help improve comprehensiveness. This study aimed to describe the SOP of PCPs working in clinics and to identify SOP-associated factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Shizuoka, Japan.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>PCPs working in clinics offering internal medicine.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The total number of services provided, covering 109 items, was categorised into 8 clinical areas, 78 clinical activities and 23 procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questionnaires were mailed to 1191 clinics, and 389 valid responses were included in the analysis. Of the 389 physicians, 254 (65.3%) were internal medicine specialists, and 382 (98.2%) worked in their own private clinics. The mean number of services provided was 60.4±17.4. Clinical activities were provided less frequently in the areas of paediatric and adolescent care, women's health, home healthcare, palliative care and mental health. Physician-related factors were more significantly associated with SOP than practice or environmental factors. Preference for broad practice was the strongest factor associated with a broader SOP, followed by completion of the Japan Medical Association (JMA) primary care training programme and rotational training experience. Additionally, younger physician age, rural practice experience, surgical specialisation, a larger number of physicians in the clinic, higher patient volume and a more rural setting were associated with broader SOP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physician preference regarding SOP, completion of the JMA primary care training programme and rotational training are key factors influencing SOP. These findings suggest that postgraduate clinical training with a broad scope not limited to internal medicine and continuing medical education after establishing a private clinic, particularly for physicians who prefer broad practice, may be important in expanding the SOP of PCPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795410/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2024-003191","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The scope of practice (SOP) of primary care physicians (PCPs) has been narrowing, with declining comprehensiveness leading to fragmented care. Identifying SOP-associated factors can help improve comprehensiveness. This study aimed to describe the SOP of PCPs working in clinics and to identify SOP-associated factors.

Design: A cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire.

Setting: Shizuoka, Japan.

Participants: PCPs working in clinics offering internal medicine.

Main outcome measures: The total number of services provided, covering 109 items, was categorised into 8 clinical areas, 78 clinical activities and 23 procedures.

Results: Questionnaires were mailed to 1191 clinics, and 389 valid responses were included in the analysis. Of the 389 physicians, 254 (65.3%) were internal medicine specialists, and 382 (98.2%) worked in their own private clinics. The mean number of services provided was 60.4±17.4. Clinical activities were provided less frequently in the areas of paediatric and adolescent care, women's health, home healthcare, palliative care and mental health. Physician-related factors were more significantly associated with SOP than practice or environmental factors. Preference for broad practice was the strongest factor associated with a broader SOP, followed by completion of the Japan Medical Association (JMA) primary care training programme and rotational training experience. Additionally, younger physician age, rural practice experience, surgical specialisation, a larger number of physicians in the clinic, higher patient volume and a more rural setting were associated with broader SOP.

Conclusion: Physician preference regarding SOP, completion of the JMA primary care training programme and rotational training are key factors influencing SOP. These findings suggest that postgraduate clinical training with a broad scope not limited to internal medicine and continuing medical education after establishing a private clinic, particularly for physicians who prefer broad practice, may be important in expanding the SOP of PCPs.

日本初级保健医生的执业范围及其相关因素:横断面研究。
目的:初级保健医生(pcp)的执业范围(SOP)不断缩小,综合性下降导致护理碎片化。识别与sop相关的因素有助于提高全面性。本研究旨在描述临床执业医师的SOP,并找出SOP的相关因素。设计:采用自填问卷的横断面研究。环境:日本静冈。参与者:在提供内科医疗的诊所工作的初级医师。主要结果测量:提供的服务总数,涵盖109项,分为8个临床领域,78个临床活动和23个程序。结果:共向1191家诊所发放问卷,回收有效问卷389份。在389名医生中,254名(65.3%)内科专科医生,382名(98.2%)在自己的私人诊所工作。平均服务次数为60.4±17.4次。在儿科和青少年保健、妇女保健、家庭保健、姑息治疗和精神保健等领域提供的临床活动较少。医师相关因素与SOP的相关性高于实践或环境因素。对广泛实践的偏好是与更广泛的SOP相关的最强因素,其次是完成日本医学会(JMA)初级保健培训方案和轮岗培训经验。此外,较年轻的医生年龄、农村执业经验、外科专科、诊所医生数量较多、患者数量较多和农村环境较多与更广泛的SOP相关。结论:医师对SOP的偏好、JMA初级保健培训计划的完成程度和轮岗培训是影响SOP的关键因素。这些发现表明,在建立私人诊所后,研究生临床培训范围广泛,不限于内科和继续医学教育,特别是对于喜欢广泛实践的医生,可能对扩大pcp的SOP很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine and Community Health (FMCH) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the topics of family medicine, general practice and community health. FMCH strives to be a leading international journal that promotes ‘Health Care for All’ through disseminating novel knowledge and best practices in primary care, family medicine, and community health. FMCH publishes original research, review, methodology, commentary, reflection, and case-study from the lens of population health. FMCH’s Asian Focus section features reports of family medicine development in the Asia-pacific region. FMCH aims to be an exemplary forum for the timely communication of medical knowledge and skills with the goal of promoting improved health care through the practice of family and community-based medicine globally. FMCH aims to serve a diverse audience including researchers, educators, policymakers and leaders of family medicine and community health. We also aim to provide content relevant for researchers working on population health, epidemiology, public policy, disease control and management, preventative medicine and disease burden. FMCH does not impose any article processing charges (APC) or submission charges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信