Machine learning in shoulder arthroplasty : a systematic review of predictive analytics applications.

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Tim Schneller, Moritz Kraus, Jan Schätz, Philipp Moroder, Markus Scheibel, Asimina Lazaridou
{"title":"Machine learning in shoulder arthroplasty : a systematic review of predictive analytics applications.","authors":"Tim Schneller, Moritz Kraus, Jan Schätz, Philipp Moroder, Markus Scheibel, Asimina Lazaridou","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.62.BJO-2024-0234.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Machine learning (ML) holds significant promise in optimizing various aspects of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), potentially improving patient outcomes and enhancing surgical decision-making. The aim of this systematic review was to identify ML algorithms and evaluate their effectiveness, including those for predicting clinical outcomes and those used in image analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for studies applying ML algorithms in TSA. The analysis focused on dataset characteristics, relevant subspecialties, specific ML algorithms used, and their performance outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the final screening process, 25 articles satisfied the eligibility criteria for our review. Of these, 60% focused on tabular data while the remaining 40% analyzed image data. Among them, 16 studies were dedicated to developing new models and nine used transfer learning to leverage existing pretrained models. Additionally, three of these models underwent external validation to confirm their reliability and effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ML algorithms used in TSA demonstrated fair to good performance, as evidenced by the reported metrics. Integrating these models into daily clinical practice could revolutionize TSA, enhancing both surgical precision and patient outcome predictions. Despite their potential, the lack of transparency and generalizability in many current models poses a significant challenge, limiting their clinical utility. Future research should prioritize addressing these limitations to truly propel the field forward and maximize the benefits of ML in enhancing patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 2","pages":"126-134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790313/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.62.BJO-2024-0234.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Machine learning (ML) holds significant promise in optimizing various aspects of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), potentially improving patient outcomes and enhancing surgical decision-making. The aim of this systematic review was to identify ML algorithms and evaluate their effectiveness, including those for predicting clinical outcomes and those used in image analysis.

Methods: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for studies applying ML algorithms in TSA. The analysis focused on dataset characteristics, relevant subspecialties, specific ML algorithms used, and their performance outcomes.

Results: Following the final screening process, 25 articles satisfied the eligibility criteria for our review. Of these, 60% focused on tabular data while the remaining 40% analyzed image data. Among them, 16 studies were dedicated to developing new models and nine used transfer learning to leverage existing pretrained models. Additionally, three of these models underwent external validation to confirm their reliability and effectiveness.

Conclusion: ML algorithms used in TSA demonstrated fair to good performance, as evidenced by the reported metrics. Integrating these models into daily clinical practice could revolutionize TSA, enhancing both surgical precision and patient outcome predictions. Despite their potential, the lack of transparency and generalizability in many current models poses a significant challenge, limiting their clinical utility. Future research should prioritize addressing these limitations to truly propel the field forward and maximize the benefits of ML in enhancing patient care.

肩关节置换术中的机器学习:预测分析应用的系统回顾。
目的:机器学习(ML)在优化全肩关节置换术(TSA)的各个方面具有重要的前景,可能改善患者的预后并提高手术决策。本系统综述的目的是识别机器学习算法并评估其有效性,包括用于预测临床结果和用于图像分析的算法。方法:我们检索PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials数据库,查找在TSA中应用ML算法的研究。分析集中在数据集特征、相关子专业、使用的特定ML算法及其性能结果上。结果:在最后的筛选过程中,25篇文章符合我们审查的资格标准。其中,60%专注于表格数据,而其余40%则分析图像数据。其中,16项研究致力于开发新模型,9项研究使用迁移学习来利用现有的预训练模型。此外,其中三个模型进行了外部验证,以确认其可靠性和有效性。结论:在TSA中使用的ML算法表现出公平到良好的性能,正如报告的指标所证明的那样。将这些模型整合到日常临床实践中可以彻底改变TSA,提高手术精度和患者预后预测。尽管它们具有潜力,但在许多当前模型中缺乏透明度和可泛化性构成了重大挑战,限制了它们的临床应用。未来的研究应该优先解决这些限制,以真正推动该领域的发展,并最大限度地提高机器学习在增强患者护理方面的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信